Rydman R J, Tannebaum R D, Zalenski R J
Cook County Hospital, Chicago, IL.
J Med Syst. 1994 Aug;18(4):207-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00996705.
A longitudinal cross sectional study of Hospital Emergency Department (HED) procedures over a nine month period was conducted. A total of 1,541 procedures were observed on 56 randomly selected 8-h work shifts. Shifts were distributed: 34% day shift; 34% evening shift; and 32% on the night shift. Observations on the evening shift were oversampled to capture an adequate number of trauma patients. Observations were distributed: 33% day shift; 39% evening shift; and 28% on the night shift. Measurements included: type of procedure; adherence to specific barrier technique, i.e., use of gloves, gowns, masks, and eye protection; and occurrence of adverse exposure. Ten types of HED procedures were documented and analyzed. Computerized tracking of study observations established periodic rates of HED health care worker (HCW) adherence to universal precautions. These data are important for internal quality control/assurance programs and rate comparisons within and across institutions over time. The longitudinal evaluation of the database revealed that glove compliance increased over the period of the study and adverse exposure decreased. Conducting ongoing or periodic observational studies of this kind are important and necessary in order to gauge HED response to the epidemiologic challenges of urban society.
对医院急诊科(HED)九个月期间的程序进行了纵向横断面研究。在随机选择的56个8小时工作班次中,共观察了1541例程序。班次分布如下:34%为日班;34%为晚班;32%为夜班。对晚班的观察进行了过度抽样,以获取足够数量的创伤患者。观察分布如下:33%为日班;39%为晚班;28%为夜班。测量内容包括:程序类型;对特定防护技术的遵守情况,即手套、防护服、口罩和眼部防护的使用;以及不良暴露的发生情况。记录并分析了10种HED程序。通过计算机跟踪研究观察结果,确定了HED医护人员(HCW)遵守通用预防措施的定期率。这些数据对于内部质量控制/保证计划以及不同机构之间随时间的率比较非常重要。对数据库的纵向评估显示,在研究期间手套的合规性有所提高,不良暴露有所减少。为了评估HED对城市社会流行病学挑战的应对情况,进行此类持续或定期的观察性研究非常重要且必要。