Sulfaro F, Fasher B, Burgess M A
St George District Hospital, Kogarah, NSW.
Med J Aust. 1994 Sep 5;161(5):305-7.
To document and review the theoretical basis of vaccination practices and policies of homoeopaths in Sydney.
After preliminary interviews, a questionnaire was designed and mailed to all 29 homoeopaths listed in the Sydney telephone directory and practising in central Sydney.
Six homoeopaths (21%) returned the completed questionnaire and 10 others were interviewed. Their attitudes to vaccination varied widely. The two medically qualified homoeopaths recommended orthodox vaccination routinely for most children. Five of the six respondents did not recommend routine vaccination by any method. We could not obtain any scientific data about the contents of homoeopathic vaccinations. No reports evaluating homoeopathic vaccination were found in the peer-reviewed medical literature from 1982-1993.
Homoeopathic vaccination practices are variable, with no statutory body regulating them in Australia. Medically qualified homoeopaths frequently recommend orthodox vaccination.
记录并审视悉尼顺势疗法从业者的疫苗接种实践及政策的理论基础。
在初步访谈后,设计了一份问卷并邮寄给悉尼电话簿中列出且在悉尼市中心执业的所有29位顺势疗法从业者。
六位顺势疗法从业者(21%)返还了填好的问卷,另外十位接受了访谈。他们对疫苗接种的态度差异很大。两位具有医学资质的顺势疗法从业者常规建议大多数儿童接种传统疫苗。六位受访者中有五位不推荐通过任何方式进行常规疫苗接种。我们无法获取有关顺势疗法疫苗成分的任何科学数据。在1982年至1993年的同行评审医学文献中未发现评估顺势疗法疫苗接种的报告。
顺势疗法疫苗接种实践各不相同,在澳大利亚没有法定机构对其进行监管。具有医学资质的顺势疗法从业者经常推荐接种传统疫苗。