• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院药物滥用者样本中的动机亚型。

Motivational subtypes in an inpatient sample of substance abusers.

作者信息

Isenhart C E

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55417.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 1994 Sep-Oct;19(5):463-75. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(94)90002-7.

DOI:10.1016/0306-4603(94)90002-7
PMID:7832005
Abstract

Motivational subgroups in a sample of inpatient substance abusers were identified to facilitate future development of treatment interventions aimed at enhancing compliance and involvement. The modified Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scales from 165 subjects were subject to factor and cluster analyses. Results suggest the instrument assesses three dimensions: determination, action, and contemplation. Using these dimensions, three subgroups were identified: Uninvolved, Ambivalent, and Active. There were no differences on demographic or background variables or Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 (MMPI-2) profiles. The Uninvolved group scored significantly lower than the other two groups on measures of alcohol use and abuse. The Ambivalent and Active groups did not differ on any of the measures of alcohol use and abuse. The Ambivalent group demonstrated a high level of conflict and inaction. The Active group appeared to be aware of their dependence and were ready to change their behavior. The results have implications for treatment matching and enhancing treatment motivation.

摘要

在住院药物滥用者样本中确定了动机亚组,以促进未来旨在提高依从性和参与度的治疗干预措施的发展。对165名受试者的修改后的改变准备阶段和治疗渴望量表进行了因子分析和聚类分析。结果表明,该量表评估三个维度:决心、行动和沉思。利用这些维度,确定了三个亚组:无参与组、矛盾组和积极组。在人口统计学或背景变量或明尼苏达多相人格问卷2(MMPI-2)剖面图上没有差异。无参与组在酒精使用和滥用测量方面的得分显著低于其他两组。矛盾组和积极组在任何酒精使用和滥用测量方面均无差异。矛盾组表现出高度的冲突和不作为。积极组似乎意识到了自己的依赖性,并准备好改变行为。这些结果对治疗匹配和提高治疗动机具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Motivational subtypes in an inpatient sample of substance abusers.住院药物滥用者样本中的动机亚型。
Addict Behav. 1994 Sep-Oct;19(5):463-75. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(94)90002-7.
2
Personality characteristics of cocaine and alcohol abusers: more alike than different.
Addict Behav. 1992;17(2):159-66. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(92)90020-v.
3
Relationship between readiness for and processes of change in a sample of alcohol dependent males.酒精依赖男性样本中改变的准备状态与改变过程之间的关系。
J Subst Abuse. 1998;10(2):175-84. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(99)80132-1.
4
Personality subtypes, coping styles, symptom correlates, and substances of choice among a cohort of substance abusers.
Assessment. 1998 Jun;5(2):157-69. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500206.
5
An initial evaluation of the psychosocial dimensions of the American Society of Addiction Medicine criteria for inpatient versus intensive outpatient substance abuse rehabilitation.对美国成瘾医学协会住院与强化门诊药物滥用康复标准的社会心理维度的初步评估。
J Stud Alcohol. 1997 May;58(3):239-52. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1997.58.239.
6
Construct validity and predictive utility of the stages of change scale for alcoholics.酗酒者改变阶段量表的结构效度和预测效用。
J Subst Abuse. 1996;8(3):275-91. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(96)90152-2.
7
Interpersonal types among alcohol abusers: a comparison with drug abusers.酗酒者的人际类型:与吸毒者的比较。
J Clin Psychol. 1990 Jul;46(4):500-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199007)46:4<500::aid-jclp2270460419>3.0.co;2-g.
8
Predicting relapse to substance abuse as a function of personality dimensions.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998 Aug;22(5):1041-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1998.tb03696.x.
9
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the Brief Symptom Inventory among substance abusers.
J Subst Abuse. 1998;10(2):103-14. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(99)80127-8.
10
Eating disorders and substance abuse in women: a comparative study of MMPI patterns.
J Subst Abuse. 1988;1(2):209-19. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(88)80024-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Ecologically-Based Family Therapy with Substance Using, Prostituting Mothers.基于生态的家庭治疗对吸毒及从事卖淫活动母亲的影响
J Fam Ther. 2018 Nov;40(4):557-583. doi: 10.1111/1467-6427.12187. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
2
Subtypes of Alcoholics Based on Psychometric Measures.基于心理测量方法的酗酒者亚型
Alcohol Health Res World. 1996;20(1):24-29.
3
Family systems therapy for substance-using mothers and their 8- to 16-year-old children.家庭系统疗法在药物滥用母亲及其 8 至 16 岁子女中的应用。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 Sep;30(6):619-29. doi: 10.1037/adb0000199. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
4
What makes group MET work? A randomized controlled trial of college student drinkers in mandated alcohol diversion.群体 MET 为何有效?一项针对大学生饮酒者的强制性酒精转移随机对照试验
Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Dec;23(4):598-612. doi: 10.1037/a0016633.
5
Predicting treatment seekers' readiness to change their drinking behavior in the COMBINE Study.预测 COMBINE 研究中治疗寻求者改变饮酒行为的准备程度。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009 May;33(5):879-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.00905.x. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
6
Do genetic and individual risk factors moderate the efficacy of motivational enhancement therapy? Drinking outcomes with an emerging adult sample.基因和个体风险因素是否会调节动机增强疗法的疗效?针对新兴成年人群样本的饮酒结果。
Addict Biol. 2009 Jul;14(3):356-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2009.00149.x. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
7
Understanding treatment readiness in recently assessed, pre-treatment substance abusers.了解近期评估的治疗前药物滥用者的治疗准备情况。
Subst Abus. 2007 Mar;28(1):11-23. doi: 10.1300/J465v28n01_03.
8
Convergent and discriminant validity of three measures of stage of change.三种改变阶段测量方法的收敛效度和区分效度。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Sep;22(3):362-71. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.3.362.
9
Measuring readiness-to-change substance misuse among psychiatric outpatients: I. Reliability and validity of self-report measures.测量精神科门诊患者对改变药物滥用问题的准备情况:I. 自我报告测量方法的信度和效度
J Stud Alcohol. 2001 Jan;62(1):79-88. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.79.
10
Motivation for change and alcoholism treatment.改变的动机与酒精成瘾治疗
Alcohol Res Health. 1999;23(2):86-92.