Naziri W, Cheadle W G, Trachtenberg L S, Montgomery W D, Polk H C
Price Institute for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, KY.
Am Surg. 1995 Jan;61(1):11-5.
As long as infection remains the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in severely ill patients, there exists the need for more effective anti-infective therapy. The current study was undertaken to determine whether continuous infusion (CONT) is superior to intermittent administration (INT) of an equal amount of cefazolin (CEF) in a model of surgical infection. The thigh suture model consists of the surgical placement of 1 cm of cotton suture with absorbed K. pneumoniae into the thigh muscle of mice. The experimental groups were: 1) controls (n = 20) with thigh suture inoculation and treatment with intraperitoneal (IP) sterile saline; 2) CONT infusion group that received CEF at 60 mg/kg IP 30 minutes before inoculation followed by CONT IP infusion at 180 mg/kg/day (n = 22) for 3 days; and 3) INT injection group that received CEF at 60 mg/kg IP 30 minutes before inoculation followed by INT IP injections every 8 hours at 180 mg/kg/day (n = 20) for 3 days. All CEF treated animals received identical quantities of total CEF, and all groups were followed for 10 days. The control and INT CEF groups had 20% survival, whereas the CONT CEF group had 81% survival, (P < 0.001). Continuous CEF yielded constant serum levels of 19 +/- 1 micrograms/mL, whereas INT injections resulted in peak serum level of 74 +/- 12 micrograms/mL at one minute but declined to 3.9 +/- 0.9 micrograms/mL in 2 hours. Although there was statistically significant tissue bacterial growth in the INT injection group, there was extensive tissue bacterial clearance in the CONT infusion group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)