• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Psychological evaluation of Japanese astronaut applicants.

作者信息

Sekiguchi C, Umikura S, Sone K, Kume M

机构信息

National Space Development Agency of Japan, Office of Space Environment Utilization Systems, Tsukuba Space Center, Ibaraki.

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Oct;65(10 Pt 1):920-4.

PMID:7832734
Abstract

In 1991, a new psychological selection procedure was employed during the selection of Japanese Space Station astronauts. It was based on international selection criteria developed by an international psychological/psychiatric working group. A total of 372 individuals--fewer than expected--submitted applications for Space Station astronaut in Japan. Of the applicants, 233 were given several psychological written tests [Anxiety Scale, Performance Test, General Aptitude Test Battery, and Environmental Adjustment Test Battery (EATB)] in Phase I of the selection. Forty-five applicants went on to take the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB), Human Assessment Method (a group test), a semi-structured psychological interview and an intelligence test in Phase II of the selection. All applicants were found to be highly intelligent. Interestingly, an unexpectedly large number of candidates were disqualified by the newly developed EATB. Assessment of individual functioning in a group (the Human Assessment Method) resulted in no applicant being ranked in either the "qualified with reservation" (QR) or "disqualified" (DQ) category. Much has been learned from this initial application of psychological "select-in" testing, but further efforts are needed to improve both psychological criteria and evaluation methods and to determine their reliability and validity.

摘要

相似文献

1
Psychological evaluation of Japanese astronaut applicants.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Oct;65(10 Pt 1):920-4.
2
Astronaut psychiatric selection procedures: a Japanese experience.宇航员的精神科选拔程序:日本的经验
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Oct;65(10 Pt 1):916-9.
3
Psychological evaluation of European astronaut applications: results of the 1991 selection campaign.欧洲宇航员申请的心理评估:1991年选拔活动的结果
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Oct;65(10 Pt 1):925-9.
4
An overview of international issues in astronaut psychological selection.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Oct;65(10 Pt 1):900-3.
5
Psychiatric diagnoses in a group of astronaut applicants.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1991 Oct;62(10):969-73.
6
Problems of psychological monitoring in astronaut training.宇航员训练中的心理监测问题。
Space Med Med Eng (Beijing). 1997 Oct;10(5):313-7.
7
Predicting astronaut effectiveness: a multivariate approach.预测宇航员的工作效率:一种多变量方法。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Oct;65(10 Pt 1):904-9.
8
Results of the ESA study on psychological selection of astronaut applicants for Columbus Missions I: aptitude testing.欧洲航天局关于哥伦布一号任务宇航员申请者心理选拔的研究结果:能力倾向测试
Acta Astronaut. 1992 Jul;27:131-8. doi: 10.1016/0094-5765(92)90189-p.
9
[Psychiatric selection of European astronauts: the French experience].
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1992 Nov;150(9):693-8.
10
The loneliness of the long-duration astronaut.长期执行任务的宇航员的孤独感。
Air Space. 1996 Jun-Jul;11(2):37-45.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of spatial ability and experience on performance during spaceship rendezvous and docking.空间能力和经验对飞船交会对接任务中表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 15;6:955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00955. eCollection 2015.