Suppr超能文献

实验室失误再探讨。

Laboratory blunders revisited.

作者信息

Lapworth R, Teal T K

机构信息

Department of Clinical Chemistry, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, Kent, UK.

出版信息

Ann Clin Biochem. 1994 Jan;31 ( Pt 1):78-84. doi: 10.1177/000456329403100113.

Abstract

Blunders which occurred over a 1 year period in the clinical chemistry departments of two health districts were recorded and categorized according to type and detection stage. A blunder was defined as an incident leading to an incorrect result/set of results either being reported or detected at the final checking-out stage in the laboratory. Of the total of 120 blunders--which is a blunder rate of less than 0.1% of requests--53 (44%) were detected at the final checking-out stage. Blunders detected after the report had left the laboratory were divided into those subsequently picked up by laboratory personnel (23); those detected by clinicians (19); and those by external quality assessment schemes (21). The types of blunder were fairly equally distributed between the booking-in (36), analysis (38), and reporting (35) stages of the laboratory process. A formal review of blunders detected in laboratories is a valuable aid to overall performance.

摘要

记录了两个卫生区临床化学部门在一年时间内发生的失误,并根据类型和检测阶段进行了分类。失误被定义为导致在实验室最终检查阶段报告或检测到错误结果/结果集的事件。在总共120起失误中(失误率不到请求数的0.1%),53起(44%)在最终检查阶段被检测到。报告离开实验室后检测到的失误分为随后由实验室人员发现的(23起);由临床医生发现的(19起);以及由外部质量评估计划发现的(21起)。失误类型在实验室流程的登记(36起)、分析(38起)和报告(35起)阶段分布相当均匀。对实验室中检测到的失误进行正式审查对整体绩效有很大帮助。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验