Lunt R A, Linchongsubongkoch W, Gleeson L J
CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Vic., Australia.
Vet Microbiol. 1994 Sep;42(1):79-90. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(94)90079-5.
A selection of type O foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) viruses isolated in Thailand between 1986 and 1989 were compared to the reference viruses O1 Thailand 1960 (O BKK/60) and O Nakorn Pathom 1965 (O NPT/65) using a liquid-phase blocking ELISA (LP ELISA) to derive serum titres and associated r values. Interpolation techniques were used to increase the precision for estimation of r values through a more accurate estimation of serum titres at predicted equivalent levels of antigen input. Mean r values were 0.45 (for 56 field viruses) relative to O BKK/60 reference virus and 0.56 (for 51 field viruses) relative to O NPT/65. While only two viruses showed considerable difference (r < 0.20) to a reference virus (O BKK/60), 41% and 31% gave r values less than 0.4 for O BKK/60 and O NPT/65 respectively. This indicated antigenic differences between reference and field viruses which may result in a reduction in vaccine efficacy.
采用液相阻断酶联免疫吸附试验(LP ELISA),对1986年至1989年期间在泰国分离出的一组O型口蹄疫(FMD)病毒与参考病毒O1泰国1960(O BKK/60)和O那空拍侬1965(O NPT/65)进行比较,以得出血清滴度和相关的r值。通过更准确地估计预测等效抗原输入水平下的血清滴度,采用插值技术提高r值估计的精度。相对于O BKK/60参考病毒,56株野毒株的平均r值为0.45,相对于O NPT/65,51株野毒株的平均r值为0.56。虽然只有两种病毒与参考病毒(O BKK/60)有显著差异(r < 0.20),但分别有41%和31%的病毒相对于O BKK/60和O NPT/65的r值小于0.4。这表明参考病毒与野毒株之间存在抗原差异,可能导致疫苗效力降低。