Hendolin H, Kansanen M, Koski E, Nuutinen J
Department of Anaesthesiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994 Oct;38(7):694-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1994.tb03979.x.
A randomized prospective study was performed to compare the recovery in 41 patients undergoing uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) with either propofol-nitrous oxide-fentanyl or thiopentone-isoflurane-nitrous oxide-fentanyl anaesthesia. The patients were referred to UPPP after examination including polysomnography and otorhinolaryngological examination. The propofol group received propofol 2 mg.kg-1 for induction followed by an infusion of 10 mg.kg-1.h-1 after intubation. The thiopentone-isoflurane group received 5 mg.kg-1 of thiopentone for induction followed by isoflurane (0.5-2%) after intubation. Other medication was similar in both groups. In the propofol group the patients had a significantly better oxygen saturation during the first postoperative hour (P < 0.05), and a higher rate of breathing (P < 0.05), indicating a more rapid recovery of the physiologic control of breathing. Pain as measured by visual analogue score was lower (P < 0.05) during the second postoperative hour compared with the isoflurane group. Apneic episodes occurred with similar frequency in both groups, and they were related to the severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We conclude that propofol is preferable to thiopentone-isoflurane in UPPP operations, because physiologic respiratory control recovers faster and postoperative pain is less intense.
