Kristjánsson S, Berg-Kelly K, Winsö E
Department of Paediatrics, East Hospital, University of Göteborg, Sweden.
Acta Paediatr. 1994 Nov;83(11):1156-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb18270.x.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate effect of inhaling racemic adrenaline to treat croup and to evaluate a scoring system. Two groups were investigated. One group inhaled a racemic adrenaline solution and the other group received the same solution with no racemic adrenaline. The study was double-blinded and placebo-controlled. Fifty-four children (0.4-10.8 years) with mild to moderately severe croup were included in the study after clinical evaluation. The clinical score was useful when evaluating the treatment effects in mild to moderately severe croup and may be used as a quality assurance tool when treatment protocols are re-evaluated. Oxygen saturation before and after treatment did not change significantly in either group and therefore its measurement did not provide additional information on the effect of treatment. In both groups, a significant improvement in total mean clinical scores was seen 30 min after inhalation, compared with before inhalation (p < 0.001). However, racemic adrenaline was significantly better than placebo in terms of improvement in total clinical score, inspiratory stridor, retractions and air entry, and should therefore be used as first-line treatment.
本研究的目的是评估吸入消旋肾上腺素治疗喉炎的即时效果,并评估一种评分系统。研究了两组。一组吸入消旋肾上腺素溶液,另一组接受不含消旋肾上腺素的相同溶液。该研究采用双盲、安慰剂对照。经临床评估后,54名年龄在0.4至10.8岁之间的轻至中度重症喉炎患儿被纳入研究。临床评分在评估轻至中度重症喉炎的治疗效果时很有用,并且在重新评估治疗方案时可作为质量保证工具。两组治疗前后的血氧饱和度均无显著变化,因此其测量未提供有关治疗效果的额外信息。与吸入前相比,两组在吸入后30分钟时总平均临床评分均有显著改善(p < 0.001)。然而,在总临床评分、吸气性喘鸣、三凹征和呼吸音改善方面,消旋肾上腺素明显优于安慰剂,因此应作为一线治疗药物。