Suppr超能文献

基层医疗医生对实践指南传播的反应。

Primary care physicians' response to dissemination of practice guidelines.

作者信息

Gorton T A, Cranford C O, Golden W E, Walls R C, Pawelak J E

机构信息

Division of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.

出版信息

Arch Fam Med. 1995 Feb;4(2):135-42. doi: 10.1001/archfami.4.2.135.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Much effort has gone into producing clinical practice guidelines, but relatively few studies address dissemination issues. Unless guidelines are used, little is gained. This study evaluates the effect of three methods to disseminate asthma guidelines on physicians' behavior and attitudes toward education strategies.

METHODS

Asthma guidelines were mailed to 60 physicians in three Area Health Education Centers in Arkansas. Dissemination efforts at one site featured a short summary, telephone calls by "detailing" physicians, and a continuing medical education conference. Computer strategies were used at the second site, and a multimedia approach with facsimile messages, posters, videocassettes, audiocassettes, and a continuing medical education conference was used at the third site. A fourth site with 22 participants served as a comparison. Data were collected by mailed questionnaires, outpatient chart reviews, and physician interviews. Changes between baseline and posttest assessments following a 4-month intervention were calculated for medication use, and peak flow monitoring use was compared with the control group (general linear model). Regression analyses were used to identify physician and practice factors associated with particular education techniques.

RESULTS

Each site improved in the use of medications or peak flow monitoring, but none improved in all areas. The multimedia, continual reminder approach was well accepted but there was little support for the computer strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Further efforts to disseminate clinical guidelines should include a variety of formats with an emphasis on short, concise summaries and frequent reminders. Social influence appears to play a role and will be a fruitful area for further research.

摘要

背景

在制定临床实践指南方面已付出诸多努力,但涉及传播问题的研究相对较少。除非指南得到应用,否则收获甚微。本研究评估三种哮喘指南传播方法对医生行为以及对教育策略态度的影响。

方法

向阿肯色州三个地区健康教育中心的60名医生邮寄哮喘指南。其中一个中心的传播工作包括一份简短摘要、由“推广”医生进行电话沟通以及一场继续医学教育会议。第二个中心采用计算机策略,第三个中心采用多媒体方法,包括传真信息、海报、录像带、录音带以及一场继续医学教育会议。以22名参与者组成的第四个中心作为对照。通过邮寄问卷、门诊病历审查以及医生访谈收集数据。计算4个月干预后基线评估与测试后评估之间在药物使用方面的变化,并将峰值流量监测的使用情况与对照组进行比较(一般线性模型)。采用回归分析来确定与特定教育技术相关的医生和实践因素。

结果

每个中心在药物使用或峰值流量监测方面均有改善,但并非在所有方面都有所改善。多媒体、持续提醒的方法得到广泛认可,但对计算机策略的支持较少。

结论

进一步传播临床指南的努力应包括多种形式,重点是简短、简洁的摘要以及频繁提醒。社会影响似乎发挥了作用,将是进一步研究的一个富有成果的领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验