Lucas M J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235-9032.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Dec;37(4):794-805. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199412000-00004.
Vacuum extraction can be an effective technique for operative vaginal delivery, and in some circumstances, it may even be a useful aid in abdominal delivery. Specialized equipment is required, but surprisingly little time is necessary to effect delivery in uncomplicated applications. Rigid vacuum extractors are more effective than pliable instruments but are associated with more fetal scalp trauma. Vacuum extraction spares maternal soft tissue trauma compared with forceps but also more often fails to effect delivery. Unfortunately, both failed vacuum extraction and operative success with delivery can be associated with fetal/neonatal morbidity. It may be that vacuum extraction is an easier technique to learn than forceps, but there is indirect evidence that the ease of application may tempt misuse. Clearly, the technique can be misused, and therefore, good judgment and skill of the operator remain as important as they are in any operative procedure. There are some rare circumstances in which the unique properties of the vacuum confer advantages over forceps, but neither these indications nor the advantages are frequent or clear enough to recommend that every obstetric unit have the availability and capability of vacuum extraction instrumentation and expertise.
真空吸引术可成为一种有效的阴道助产技术,在某些情况下,甚至对剖宫产也可能是一种有用的辅助手段。该技术需要专门的设备,但在简单应用中,完成分娩所需的时间惊人地短。硬式真空吸引器比软式器械更有效,但与更多的胎儿头皮损伤有关。与产钳相比,真空吸引术可避免母体软组织损伤,但也更常导致分娩失败。不幸的是,真空吸引术失败和分娩成功都可能与胎儿/新生儿发病有关。真空吸引术可能是一种比产钳更容易学习的技术,但有间接证据表明,操作简便可能会引发滥用。显然,该技术可能被滥用,因此,操作者良好的判断力和技能在任何手术操作中都同样重要。在一些罕见的情况下,真空吸引术的独特特性使其比产钳更具优势,但这些适应证和优势都不够常见或明确,不足以建议每个产科单位都具备真空吸引器械和专业知识。