同行评审。

Peer review.

作者信息

Felton G, Swanson E A

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242-1121.

出版信息

J Prof Nurs. 1995 Jan-Feb;11(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(95)80068-9.

DOI:10.1016/s8755-7223(95)80068-9

PMID:7844277

Abstract

All research agencies and prestigious journals insist they are rewarding excellence, that they have a merit-based system, and that their system serves their mission well--all part of the ideology of the infallibility of peer review. There have been, and continue to be, criticism about the peer review system and several alternatives to peer review have been posed. A discussion of peer review is intended to allow the reader to evaluate approaches to the peer review system.

摘要

所有研究机构和著名期刊都坚称，他们奖励的是卓越，拥有基于功绩的体系，且该体系很好地服务于他们的使命——所有这些都是同行评审绝对可靠这一意识形态的一部分。过去一直存在，而且现在仍然存在对同行评审体系的批评，并且已经提出了几种替代同行评审的方法。对同行评审进行讨论旨在让读者评估同行评审体系的方法。