• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微型标记:戈德堡单极大五人格标记的简短版本。

Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers.

作者信息

Saucier G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino 92407-2397.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1994 Dec;63(3):506-16. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8
PMID:7844738
Abstract

Goldberg (1992) developed a robust set of 100 adjective markers for the Big-Five factor structure found in phenotypic personality description. Because and even briefer marker set might be advantageous under certain assessment conditions, the performance of these 100 markers in 12 data sets was scrutinized, leading to the selection of an optimally robust subset of only 40 adjectives. This "Mini-Marker" subset demonstrated unusually impressive features for an abbreviated inventory, consisting of five scales that show, in comparison to the original scales, less use of difficult items, lower interscale correlations, and somewhat higher mean inter-item correlations; alpha reliabilities are somewhat lower. A format for administering this briefer inventory is appended.

摘要

戈德堡(1992年)针对表型人格描述中发现的大五因素结构开发了一套完善的包含100个形容词的标记。由于在某些评估条件下,更简短的标记集可能具有优势,因此对这100个标记在12个数据集中的表现进行了审查,最终选出了仅由40个形容词组成的最优稳健子集。这个“迷你标记”子集作为一个简化量表展现出了异常令人印象深刻的特征,它由五个量表组成,与原始量表相比,较难项目的使用更少、量表间相关性更低,且平均项目间相关性略高;但其阿尔法信度略低。附录中给出了管理这个更简短量表的格式。

相似文献

1
Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers.微型标记:戈德堡单极大五人格标记的简短版本。
J Pers Assess. 1994 Dec;63(3):506-16. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8.
2
An analysis of a cross-cultural personality inventory: the IPIP Big-Five factor markers in Croatia.一项跨文化人格量表分析:克罗地亚的IPIP大五人格因素标记
J Pers Assess. 2007 Apr;88(2):168-77. doi: 10.1080/00223890701267993.
3
The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality.迷你国际个性项目池量表:对人格五因素的微小却有效的测量工具。
Psychol Assess. 2006 Jun;18(2):192-203. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192.
4
Adjective checklist to assess the big five personality factors in the Argentine population.形容词检查表评估阿根廷人口的五大人格因素。
J Pers Assess. 2011 Jan;93(1):46-55. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.513708.
5
Confirmatory factor analysis of the M5-50: an implementation of the International Personality Item Pool item set.M5-50 的验证性因子分析:国际人格项目池项目集的实施。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Mar;22(1):43-9. doi: 10.1037/a0017371.
6
Intersibling agreement for Goldberg's big five adjective markers.
Psychol Rep. 2000 Apr;86(2):400-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.86.2.400.
7
The HEXACO-60: a short measure of the major dimensions of personality.人格的大六因素问卷(HEXACO-60):一种简短的人格主要维度测量工具。
J Pers Assess. 2009 Jul;91(4):340-5. doi: 10.1080/00223890902935878.
8
[Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population].应对方式的多维评估:法国人群中简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)的效度验证
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-18.
9
Studies on a German (Münster) version of the temperament auto-questionnaire TEMPS-A: construction and validation of the briefTEMPS-M.关于气质自陈问卷TEMPS - A德文(明斯特)版的研究:简明TEMPS - M的编制与验证
J Affect Disord. 2005 Mar;85(1-2):53-69. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(03)00102-2.
10
[Failure effects and gender differences in perfectionism].[完美主义中的失败影响与性别差异]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):125-35.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Attachment in Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review.探索自闭症谱系障碍成人的依恋关系:一项系统综述。
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2025 Aug;53(4):813-838. doi: 10.62641/aep.v53i4.1928.
2
A Dynamic Perspective on Changes in Conscientiousness, Academic Performance and the Role of Parental Academic Expectations in Chinese High School Students: A Longitudinal Study Across 2 Years.对中国高中生尽责性、学业成绩变化以及父母学业期望作用的动态视角:一项为期两年的纵向研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 4;15(6):776. doi: 10.3390/bs15060776.
3
Why We Disclose on Social Media? Towards a Dual-Pathway Model.
我们为何在社交媒体上披露信息?迈向双路径模型。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 18;15(4):547. doi: 10.3390/bs15040547.
4
Adapting emotional support in teams: productivity, emotional stability, and conscientiousness.团队中情感支持的适应性:生产力、情绪稳定性和尽责性。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Mar 28;8:1449176. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1449176. eCollection 2025.
5
Understanding Loneliness in Older Adults During the Pandemic: Predictors and Questionnaire Validation.了解疫情期间老年人的孤独感:预测因素与问卷验证
Diseases. 2025 Feb 4;13(2):45. doi: 10.3390/diseases13020045.
6
The alone team: How an alone mindset affects group processes.独处团队:独处思维模式如何影响团队进程。
Br J Psychol. 2025 Aug;116(3):553-574. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12777. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the abbreviated Hungarian Faking Orgasm Scale for Women.匈牙利女性性高潮伪装简化量表的心理测量评估。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 12;15:1513959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1513959. eCollection 2024.
8
Predicting technostress: The Big Five model of personality and subjective well-being.预测技术压力:大五人格模型与主观幸福感。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 4;19(11):e0313247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313247. eCollection 2024.
9
Personality and cardiovascular mortality risk: a multi-cohort analysis in individuals with and without pre-existing cardiovascular disease.人格与心血管疾病死亡风险:一项针对有和没有心血管疾病病史个体的多队列分析
J Behav Med. 2025 Feb;48(1):111-119. doi: 10.1007/s10865-024-00528-9. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
10
In-Person and Online Studies Examining the Influence of Problem Solving on the Fading Affect Bias.考察问题解决对消退情感偏差影响的线下和线上研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 11;14(9):806. doi: 10.3390/bs14090806.