Kerstein R B
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Tufts University, School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Mass.
J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Nov;72(5):473-80. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90117-1.
From a pool of 89 patients, 49 patients were classified as having chronic myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome (MPDS), and 40 were classified as asymptomatic or non-MPDS patients designated as the control group for the study. To achieve balanced sample size in both groups, 40 patients were arbitrarily selected from the MPDS group. All patients from each of the two primary groups were then categorized and assigned to one or more subgroups according to the following criteria: (1) jaw classification, (2) open occlusion, (3) previous orthodontic therapy, or (4) no previous orthodontic therapy. A fifth subgroup composed of only MPDS patients and equally divided into those who had or had not experienced orthodontic therapy was established to determine whether mean disclusion time differences occur between orthodontic and nonorthodontic MPDS patients. All 80 patients were evaluated for disclusion time of their right and left mandibular excursions to determine statistical population comparisons. Statistical assessment of right and left disclusion times for women and men in the MPDS and non-MPDS groups was performed separately for each of the five subgroups. Analysis of the comparisons revealed that in all except two of the subgroups, mean disclusion time was significantly longer in the MPDS patient group than in the non-MPDS group. The two subgroups in which this was not apparent were those with open occlusion and orthodontic patients compared with nonorthodontic patients. These findings suggest that lengthy posterior disclusion time may be of diagnostic importance when the differing etiologic factors of chronic MPDS patients are evaluated.
在89名患者中,49名患者被归类为患有慢性肌筋膜疼痛功能障碍综合征(MPDS),40名被归类为无症状或非MPDS患者,指定为该研究的对照组。为了使两组样本量均衡,从MPDS组中随机选择40名患者。然后,根据以下标准将两个主要组中的所有患者进行分类并分配到一个或多个亚组:(1)颌骨分类,(2)开合,(3)既往正畸治疗,或(4)无既往正畸治疗。建立了第五个亚组,仅由MPDS患者组成,且分为接受过正畸治疗和未接受过正畸治疗的两组,以确定正畸和非正畸MPDS患者之间的平均闭合时间差异是否存在。对所有80名患者的左右下颌运动的闭合时间进行评估,以确定统计学上的总体比较。对MPDS组和非MPDS组中男性和女性的左右闭合时间进行统计评估,分别针对五个亚组中的每一个进行。比较分析显示,除两个亚组外,MPDS患者组的平均闭合时间在所有亚组中均显著长于非MPDS组。这一情况不明显的两个亚组是开合患者组以及正畸患者与非正畸患者相比的组。这些发现表明,在评估慢性MPDS患者不同的病因因素时,较长的后牙闭合时间可能具有诊断意义。