Suppr超能文献

[胺碘酮与维拉帕米/奎尼丁治疗慢性心房颤动患者]

[Amiodarone and verapamil/quinidine in treatment of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation].

作者信息

Zehender M, Meinertz T, Just H

机构信息

Abteilungen für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinik Freiburg.

出版信息

Z Kardiol. 1994;83 Suppl 5:101-8.

PMID:7846938
Abstract

Rapid, reliable and safe reestablishment of sinus rhythm is the major aim of pharmacologic treatment in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. The mainstay of therapy in this arrhythmia has been quinidine. More recently, amiodarone was shown in noncomparitive studies to be superior to class IA agents under certain conditions. In 40 patients with atrial fibrillation persisting for 4 weeks up to 2 years, the efficacy and safety of either quinidine and verapamil (days 1 to 3, quinidine 1,500 mg/day; days 4 to 6, quinidine 1,500 mg+verapamil 240 mg/day) or amiodarone therapy (days 1 to 3, amiodarone 1,200 mg/day intravenously; days 4 to 14, amiodarone 800 mg/day orally) were randomly examined. Responders continued on their effective medication for 3 months. Thereafter, all patients were treated with a fixed regimen of quinidine (480 mg/day) plus verapamil (240 mg/day) for up to 2 years. During atrial fibrillation, quinidine reduced mean ventricular cycle length by 40 ms (-5%), quinidine and verapamil increased mean cycle length by 57 ms (8%) and amiodarone by 192 ms (28%, p < 0.01). In addition, quinidine and verapamil had a characteristic "rate-smoothing" effect on atrioventricular conduction during atrial fibrillation. The rhythm was converted to sinus rhythm after quinidine in 5 (25%) of 20 patients and after the combination of quinidine and verapamil in 11 (55%) of 20 patients. Amiodarone restored sinus rhythm in 12 (60%) of 20 patients. Overall, a shorter duration of atrial fibrillation (p < 0.05) and a smaller left atrial size (p < 0.01) were predictive of successful conversion of the arrhythmia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

快速、可靠且安全地恢复窦性心律是慢性房颤患者药物治疗的主要目标。治疗这种心律失常的主要药物一直是奎尼丁。最近,在非对照研究中显示,胺碘酮在某些情况下优于IA类药物。在40例房颤持续4周以上至2年的患者中,随机检查了奎尼丁与维拉帕米联合用药(第1至3天,奎尼丁1500毫克/天;第4至6天,奎尼丁1500毫克+维拉帕米240毫克/天)或胺碘酮治疗(第1至3天,静脉注射胺碘酮1200毫克/天;第4至14天,口服胺碘酮800毫克/天)的疗效和安全性。有反应者继续服用有效药物3个月。此后,所有患者接受固定方案的奎尼丁(480毫克/天)加维拉帕米(240毫克/天)治疗,最长2年。房颤期间,奎尼丁使平均心室周期长度缩短40毫秒(-5%),奎尼丁与维拉帕米联合用药使平均周期长度增加57毫秒(8%),胺碘酮使平均周期长度增加192毫秒(28%,p<0.01)。此外,奎尼丁与维拉帕米在房颤期间对房室传导有独特的“心率平滑”作用。20例患者中,20例服用奎尼丁后5例(25%)转为窦性心律,20例服用奎尼丁与维拉帕米联合用药后11例(55%)转为窦性心律。20例患者中,12例(60%)服用胺碘酮后恢复窦性心律。总体而言,房颤持续时间较短(p<0.05)和左心房较小(p<0.01)是心律失常成功转复的预测因素。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验