• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰腺和胆管刷检的准确性及形态学特征

Accuracy and morphologic aspects of pancreatic and biliary duct brushings.

作者信息

Layfield L J, Wax T D, Lee J G, Cotton P B

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 1995 Jan-Feb;39(1):11-8.

PMID:7846997
Abstract

One hundred eight brushing cytology specimens with adequate follow-up were obtained from strictures of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. The material was classified as benign, reactive, low grade dysplasia, high grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. A diagnosis of carcinoma was made in 18 patients, high grade dysplasia in 12, low grade dysplasia in 6 and benign, nonneoplastic in the remaining cases. The diagnostic sensitivity for carcinoma was 44%, with a specificity of 98%. Ten of 12 patients with high grade dysplasia demonstrated other evidence of carcinoma. No complications were encountered. Brushing cytodiagnosis of extrahepatic biliary and pancreatic duct strictures appears to be a safe procedure, with high specificity but only modest sensitivity.

摘要

从胆管和胰管狭窄处获取了108份有充分随访资料的刷片细胞学标本。材料被分类为良性、反应性、低级别发育异常、高级别发育异常或腺癌。18例患者诊断为癌,12例为高级别发育异常,6例为低级别发育异常,其余病例为良性、非肿瘤性。癌的诊断敏感性为44%,特异性为98%。12例高级别发育异常患者中有10例显示出癌的其他证据。未遇到并发症。肝外胆管和胰管狭窄的刷片细胞诊断似乎是一种安全的检查方法,特异性高但敏感性一般。

相似文献

1
Accuracy and morphologic aspects of pancreatic and biliary duct brushings.胰腺和胆管刷检的准确性及形态学特征
Acta Cytol. 1995 Jan-Feb;39(1):11-8.
2
Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.1000例胰腺和胆管刷检细胞学检查:结果回顾及制片方法比较
Cancer. 2006 Aug 25;108(4):231-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21842.
3
A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.常规细胞学检查与荧光原位杂交技术在检测恶性胆管狭窄中的比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1675-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30281.x.
4
Diagnostic benefit of biliary brush cytology in cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis.原发性硬化性胆管炎中胆管癌的胆汁刷检细胞学诊断价值
J Hepatol. 2006 Oct;45(4):568-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.05.010. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
5
Brush cytology of the extrahepatic biliary tract: comparison of cytologic features of adenocarcinoma and benign biliary strictures.肝外胆道的刷片细胞学检查:腺癌与良性胆管狭窄的细胞学特征比较
Mod Pathol. 1995 Jun;8(5):498-502.
6
Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中胆管狭窄刷检细胞学的前瞻性评估
Endoscopy. 1999 Nov;31(9):712-7. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-73.
7
Beyond cytomorphology: expanding the diagnostic potential for biliary cytology.超越细胞形态学:拓展胆汁细胞学的诊断潜力
Diagn Cytopathol. 2012 Jun;40(6):536-41. doi: 10.1002/dc.22839.
8
Brush cytology of the biliary tract: retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation.胆道刷片细胞学检查:278例病例的回顾性研究及其与组织病理学的相关性
Diagn Cytopathol. 2002 May;26(5):273-7. doi: 10.1002/dc.10098.
9
Benign, dysplastic, or malignant--making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients.良性、发育异常或恶性——解读内镜下胆管刷检细胞学检查结果:149例连续患者的结果
Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 May;90(5):722-6.
10
Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.常规刷检细胞学检查和荧光原位杂交技术评估胰胆管狭窄。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.040. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Pronounced squamous cell contamination in biliary tract cytology: A diagnostic pitfall.胆道细胞学中明显的鳞状细胞污染:一个诊断陷阱。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2022 Nov;50(11):E320-E324. doi: 10.1002/dc.25008. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
2
Optimal tissue sampling during ERCP and emerging molecular techniques for the differentiation of benign and malignant biliary strictures.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)期间的最佳组织采样以及用于鉴别良恶性胆管狭窄的新兴分子技术。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr 15;14:17562848211002023. doi: 10.1177/17562848211002023. eCollection 2021.
3
Bile duct involvement by hepatocellular carcinoma: A rare occurrence and poor prognostic indicator in bile duct brushing samples.
肝细胞癌累及胆管:胆管刷检样本中罕见的发生情况及不良预后指标。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2019 Nov;127(11):691-699. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22185. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
4
Cytologic features of tubular adenoma of ampulla causing distal common bile duct stricture: A case report and review of the literature.壶腹管状腺瘤致胆总管远端狭窄的细胞学特征:1例报告并文献复习
Cytojournal. 2017 Aug 22;14:19. doi: 10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_2_17. eCollection 2017.
5
Cytologic predictors of malignancy in bile duct brushings: a multi-reviewer analysis of 60 cases.胆管刷片中恶性肿瘤的细胞学预测因子:60 例多评阅者分析。
Mod Pathol. 2017 Sep;30(9):1273-1286. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.51. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
6
FGF21 is a biomarker for mitochondrial translation and mtDNA maintenance disorders.成纤维细胞生长因子21是线粒体翻译和线粒体DNA维持障碍的生物标志物。
Neurology. 2016 Nov 29;87(22):2290-2299. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003374. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
7
Cytopathological diagnosis of gallbladder mass and mural thickening based on imaging findings: A prospective study of 51 cases.基于影像学表现的胆囊肿物及壁增厚的细胞病理学诊断:51例前瞻性研究
J Cytol. 2015 Oct-Dec;32(4):234-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9371.171231.
8
The Detection of Cholangiocarcinoma in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Patients: Single Center Experience.原发性硬化性胆管炎患者胆管癌的检测:单中心经验
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2016 Mar;47(1):8-14. doi: 10.1007/s12029-015-9777-1.
9
The diagnostic value of brush cytology alone and in combination with tumor markers in pancreaticobiliary strictures.单独及联合肿瘤标志物时刷检细胞学在胰胆管狭窄中的诊断价值
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:580254. doi: 10.1155/2015/580254. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
10
Utilization of ancillary studies in the cytologic diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic lesions: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines.辅助检查在胆管和胰腺病变细胞学诊断中的应用:帕潘icolaou细胞病理学协会指南
Cytojournal. 2014 Jun 2;11(Suppl 1):4. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.133352. eCollection 2014.