Amortegui A J, Meyer M P
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Apr;65(4):523-6.
An enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens was compared with isolation of the organism in cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells using duplicate cervical swab specimens from 514 women. Chlamydia trachomatis was isolated after subculturing from 45 of 514 (8.8%) specimens, while the enzyme immunoassay, Chlamydiazyme detected chlamydial antigens in 37 of 45 (82.2%) of those women. Chlamydiazyme was as sensitive as primary isolation for detecting total infections. The specificity of Chlamydiazyme was 98.1%. The predictive values of a positive and negative Chlamydiazyme test compared with isolation after subculturing was 80.4 and 98.3%, respectively. Overall, 497 of 514 (96.7%) samples were identified correctly by Chlamydiazyme. Thus, Chlamydiazyme is a simple and rapid test that eliminates many of the problems encountered by isolation procedures.
采用来自514名女性的双份宫颈拭子标本,对一种用于检测沙眼衣原体抗原的酶免疫测定法与在经放线菌酮处理的 McCoy 细胞中分离该病原体的方法进行了比较。在514份标本中的45份(8.8%)进行传代培养后分离出了沙眼衣原体,而酶免疫测定法Chlamydiazyme在这些女性中的45份中的37份(82.2%)检测到了衣原体抗原。Chlamydiazyme在检测总体感染方面与初次分离一样敏感。Chlamydiazyme的特异性为98.1%。与传代培养后的分离结果相比,Chlamydiazyme检测呈阳性和阴性的预测值分别为80.4%和98.3%。总体而言,Chlamydiazyme正确鉴定了514份样本中的497份(96.7%)。因此,Chlamydiazyme是一种简单快速的检测方法,消除了分离程序中遇到的许多问题。