• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干预对胆固醇筛查项目中转诊及生活方式建议依从性的影响。

Effects of intervention on compliance to referral and lifestyle recommendations given at cholesterol screening programs.

作者信息

Gans K M, Lapane K L, Lasater T M, Carleton R A

机构信息

Division of Health Education, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket 02860.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 1994 Sep-Oct;10(5):275-82.

PMID:7848670
Abstract

To enhance compliance to physician referral as well as dietary and other lifestyle recommendations given at blood cholesterol (BC) screening programs, we randomized Pawtucket Heart Health Program SCORE (screening, counseling, referral event) participants with elevated BC levels into one of four groups: usual care group; a participant intervention group (mailed reminder letter and refrigerator magnet); a physician intervention group (mailed packet to participant's physician including letter, National Cholesterol Education Program [NCEP] guidelines, and preaddressed postcard to mail to patient); and a group that received both interventions. Beginning four months after the screening, we surveyed study subjects by phone. The participant intervention increased recall of physician referral and dietary recommendations; however, neither intervention successfully improved compliance to referral or dietary and lifestyle recommendations. Overall, 58%, 67% and 34% of subjects reported complying to physician referral, dietary recommendations, and lifestyle recommendations, respectively. Referral compliance was associated with a longer time interval between screening and survey (relative risk [RR] = 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI[ = 1.0, 1.7), possession of medical insurance that covered physician visits (RR = 2.1, 95% CI = 0.98, 4.4), and history of hypertension (RR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.1, 5.8). Dietary compliance was positively associated with baseline BC levels > or = 240 mg/dL (RR = 3.3, 95% CI = 1.4, 7.3) and negatively associated with increasing age; each one year increase in age corresponded to a 3% decrease in compliance (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.9. 1.0).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为提高对医生转诊以及血液胆固醇(BC)筛查项目中给出的饮食和其他生活方式建议的依从性,我们将BC水平升高的波塔基特心脏健康项目SCORE(筛查、咨询、转诊活动)参与者随机分为四组:常规护理组;参与者干预组(邮寄提醒信和冰箱贴);医生干预组(给参与者的医生邮寄资料包,包括信件、国家胆固醇教育计划[NCEP]指南以及给患者邮寄的预填地址明信片);以及接受两种干预的组。在筛查开始四个月后,我们通过电话对研究对象进行了调查。参与者干预提高了对医生转诊和饮食建议的回忆;然而,两种干预均未成功提高对转诊或饮食及生活方式建议的依从性。总体而言,分别有58%、67%和34%的研究对象报告依从了医生转诊、饮食建议和生活方式建议。转诊依从性与筛查和调查之间的时间间隔较长(相对风险[RR]=1.3,95%置信区间[CI]=1.0,1.7)、拥有涵盖看医生的医疗保险(RR=2.1,95%CI=0.98,4.4)以及高血压病史(RR=2.6,95%CI=1.1,5.8)相关。饮食依从性与基线BC水平≥240mg/dL呈正相关(RR=3.3,95%CI=1.4,7.3),与年龄增长呈负相关;年龄每增加一岁,依从性相应降低3%(RR=0.97,95%CI=0.9,1.0)。(摘要截选至250字)

相似文献

1
Effects of intervention on compliance to referral and lifestyle recommendations given at cholesterol screening programs.干预对胆固醇筛查项目中转诊及生活方式建议依从性的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 1994 Sep-Oct;10(5):275-82.
2
The PREMIER intervention helps participants follow the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension dietary pattern and the current Dietary Reference Intakes recommendations.“总理干预措施”帮助参与者遵循“终止高血压膳食方法”饮食模式以及当前的膳食参考摄入量建议。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Sep;107(9):1541-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.06.019.
3
Evaluation of referral completion after a workplace cholesterol screening program.职场胆固醇筛查项目后转诊完成情况的评估
Am J Prev Med. 1991 Nov-Dec;7(6):335-40.
4
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
5
Influence on lifestyle measures and five-year coronary risk by a comprehensive lifestyle intervention programme in patients with coronary heart disease.冠心病患者综合生活方式干预计划对生活方式措施及五年冠心病风险的影响。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2003 Dec;10(6):429-37. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000107024.38316.6a.
6
Public cholesterol screening in the previously diagnosed: misuse of resources or beneficial function?对既往已确诊患者进行公共胆固醇筛查:资源滥用还是有益功能?
Am J Prev Med. 1994 Jan-Feb;10(1):20-5.
7
Effect of screening and referral on follow-up and treatment of high blood cholesterol levels.筛查与转诊对高胆固醇水平随访及治疗的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 1988 Sep-Oct;4(5):244-8.
8
Patterns of physicians' treatments for referral patients from public cholesterol screening.医生对来自公共胆固醇筛查转诊患者的治疗模式。
Am J Prev Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;7(5):273-9.
9
A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening.一项关于针对性和个性化干预对结直肠癌筛查影响的随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2007 Nov 1;110(9):2083-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23022.
10
Physicians encouraging colorectal screening: a randomized controlled trial of enhanced office and patient management on compliance with colorectal cancer screening.医生鼓励进行结直肠癌筛查:一项关于强化诊室及患者管理对结直肠癌筛查依从性影响的随机对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jan 12;169(1):47-55. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.519.

引用本文的文献

1
Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes.纸质形式的人工生成提醒:对专业实践和患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 18;12(12):CD001174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001174.pub4.
2
Selecting the optimal risk threshold of diabetes risk scores to identify high-risk individuals for diabetes prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis.选择最佳的糖尿病风险评分风险阈值以识别糖尿病预防的高危个体:成本效益分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2020 Apr;57(4):447-454. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01451-1. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
3
Cost-effectiveness of alternative thresholds of the fasting plasma glucose test to identify the target population for type 2 diabetes prevention in adults aged ≥45 years.
空腹血糖检测不同阈值用于识别≥45岁成年人2型糖尿病预防目标人群的成本效益分析
Diabetes Care. 2013 Dec;36(12):3992-8. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0497. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
4
Interventions to enhance adherence to dietary advice for preventing and managing chronic diseases in adults.提高成年人预防和管理慢性病饮食建议依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28(2):CD008722. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008722.pub2.
5
Dietary advice given by a dietitian versus other health professional or self-help resources to reduce blood cholesterol.营养师给出的与其他健康专业人士或自助资源相比的降低血液胆固醇的饮食建议。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2003(1):CD001366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001366.