Sarkar P, Andrade C, Kapur B, Das P, Sivaramakrishna Y, Harihar C, Pandey A, Anand A, Dharmendra M S
Department of Psychiatry, Command Hospital, Air Force, India.
Convuls Ther. 1994 Dec;10(4):271-8.
In a double-blind, prospective study, 30 consecutive treatment-naive adult men with first-onset psychosis and DSM-IIIR provisional schizophreniform disorder (without good prognostic features) were randomized into true electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and sham ECT groups. Both groups received haloperidol in a fixed dose of 15 mg at night. The ECT schedule comprised six bilateral, sinusoidal wave treatments administered on alternate days, thrice a week. Weekly ratings for the first 6 weeks showed an absence of significant difference between the groups in the number of patients responding and in the rate of attenuation of psychosis; severity of depression, while less in the true ECT group after the first 3 weeks, did not differ between the groups at any subsequent time point. Clinical ratings were repeated at 6 months, and social functioning was assessed; again, no group differences emerged. It is concluded that ECT does not meaningfully improve response in unselected schizophreniform disorder that is treated with an adequate dose of neuroleptic.
在一项双盲前瞻性研究中,30名连续的首次发作精神病且符合DSM-IIIR临时精神分裂症样障碍(无良好预后特征)的未接受过治疗的成年男性被随机分为真正的电休克治疗(ECT)组和假ECT组。两组均在夜间接受固定剂量15毫克的氟哌啶醇治疗。ECT方案包括每周三次、隔天进行的六次双侧正弦波治疗。前6周的每周评分显示,两组在有反应的患者数量和精神病缓解率方面无显著差异;抑郁严重程度在真正的ECT组中在前3周后较低,但在随后的任何时间点两组之间均无差异。在6个月时重复进行临床评分,并评估社会功能;同样,未发现组间差异。得出的结论是,对于接受足够剂量抗精神病药物治疗的未选择的精神分裂症样障碍,ECT并不能显著改善反应。