Rau H G, Meyer G, Maiwald G, Schardey M, Merkle R, Lange V, Schildberg F W
Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Klinikum Grosshadern.
Chirurg. 1994 Dec;65(12):1121-5.
Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become established as the procedure of choice for the treatment of symptomatic cholecystolithiasis while the application of this method for acute cholecystitis has been propagated with restrainment. In a prospective study 114 conventional (right subcostal incision) and 102 laparoscopic cholecystectomies for this indication were compared. The overall complication rate amounted 10.7% for conventional cholecystectomy and 8.9% for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The rate of conversion was 9.2%. Due to the fact that intraoperative cholangiography was carried out in 60% of conventional cholecystectomies and in only one of laparoscopic procedures the arithmetic advantage of minimally invasive technique with respect to blood loss and operating time does not allow final conclusions. These patients however recovered clearly faster and could be discharged after an average of 5.2 +/- 4.2 postoperative days, while the hospitalisation after conventional operations amounted to 7.6 +/- 3.8 days (p < 0.001).
选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术已成为治疗有症状胆囊结石的首选手术方法,而该方法在急性胆囊炎中的应用一直受到限制。在一项前瞻性研究中,对114例采用传统方法(右肋缘下切口)和102例采用腹腔镜进行该手术的患者进行了比较。传统胆囊切除术的总体并发症发生率为10.7%,腹腔镜胆囊切除术为8.9%。中转率为9.2%。由于60%的传统胆囊切除术进行了术中胆管造影,而腹腔镜手术仅1例进行了术中胆管造影,就失血情况和手术时间而言,微创技术的算术优势尚无法得出最终结论。然而,这些患者恢复明显更快,术后平均5.2±4.2天即可出院,而传统手术患者的住院时间为7.6±3.8天(p<0.001)。