• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆囊手术前长时间等待的后果。

Consequences of prolonged wait before gallbladder surgery.

作者信息

Cheruvu C V N, Eyre-Brook I A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Taunton & Somerset Hospital, Taunton, UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Jan;84(1):20-2.

PMID:11892728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2503768/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to document the morbidity associated with long waiting times for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to relate this to the nature of initial presentation either routine out-patient consultation or emergency admission with acute symptoms. This study was performed over a 50-month period in a DGH (serving a population of 320,000) which lacked sufficient operating capacity to allow routine early cholecystectomy after emergency admission. A total of 387 patients underwent cholecystectomy but 22 of these had an early operation after initial emergency admission with signs of peritonitis and were excluded from the study. The median waiting time for cholecystectomy in this study population of 365 patients was 170 days (range, 6-484) days. Of these 365 patients, 246 (67.4%) were listed for surgery after initial out-patient assessment (out-patient cohort) and 119 (32.6%) were diagnosed after an index emergency admission with symptomatic gallstone disease (emergency cohort). Of the 365 patients, 42 (11.5%) had one or more emergency admissions (57 admissions) with gallstone-related complications whilst on the waiting list for surgery. Complications were acute cholecystitis/biliary colic (n = 40), jaundice/cholangitis (n = 8), acute pancreatitis (n = 6) and perforated gallbladder (n = 3). Re-admissions with gallstone-related complications were much more common in patients whose initial presentation had been as an emergency. Thus, 34 of the 119 emergency cohort (28.5%) required re-admission with complications whilst only 8 of 246 (2.8%) elective cohort were re-admitted. Of the 34 re-admissions in the emergency cohort, 22 occurred within 6 weeks of their discharge from hospital. Median total and postoperative stay were significantly shorter (P < 0.001) in the elective cohort (3 and 2 days, respectively) than the emergency cohort (10 and 3 days, respectively). These results document the high incidence of complications experienced by patients waiting for an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Morbidity is highest in patients with an initial emergency admission. These results suggest that cholecystectomy should be offered to all patients presenting as an emergency with symptomatic gallstones on admission.

摘要

本研究的目的是记录腹腔镜胆囊切除术等待时间过长所带来的发病率,并将其与初始就诊情况(即常规门诊咨询或急性症状的急诊入院)的性质相关联。本研究在一家地区综合医院(服务人口为32万)进行,为期50个月,该医院缺乏足够的手术能力,无法在急诊入院后进行常规的早期胆囊切除术。共有387例患者接受了胆囊切除术,但其中22例在初次因腹膜炎体征急诊入院后接受了早期手术,被排除在研究之外。本研究中365例患者胆囊切除术的中位等待时间为170天(范围为6 - 484天)。在这365例患者中,246例(67.4%)在初次门诊评估后被列入手术名单(门诊队列),119例(32.6%)在首次因有症状的胆结石疾病急诊入院后被确诊(急诊队列)。在这365例患者中,42例(11.5%)在等待手术期间因胆结石相关并发症有一次或多次急诊入院(共57次入院)。并发症包括急性胆囊炎/胆绞痛(n = 40)、黄疸/胆管炎(n = 8)、急性胰腺炎(n = 6)和胆囊穿孔(n = 3)。初次就诊为急诊的患者因胆结石相关并发症再次入院的情况更为常见。因此,119例急诊队列中的34例(28.5%)因并发症需要再次入院,而246例择期队列中只有8例(2.8%)再次入院。在急诊队列的34例再次入院患者中,22例发生在出院后6周内。择期队列的中位总住院时间和术后住院时间(分别为3天和2天)明显短于急诊队列(分别为10天和3天)(P < 0.001)。这些结果记录了等待择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者并发症的高发生率。初次急诊入院的患者发病率最高。这些结果表明,对于所有因有症状胆结石急诊入院的患者,都应提供胆囊切除术。

相似文献

1
Consequences of prolonged wait before gallbladder surgery.胆囊手术前长时间等待的后果。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Jan;84(1):20-2.
2
Acute cholecystitis--room for improvement?急性胆囊炎——还有改进的空间吗?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Jan;84(1):10-3.
3
Implementation of a specialist-led service for the management of acute gallstone disease.实施由专科医生主导的急性胆结石疾病管理服务。
Br J Surg. 2004 Apr;91(4):504-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4458.
4
A 10-year experience with the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is it safe?腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎10年经验:是否安全?
Surg Endosc. 2001 Oct;15(10):1187-92. doi: 10.1007/s004640090098. Epub 2001 Aug 16.
5
Cholecystitis in the octogenarian: is laparoscopic cholecystectomy the best approach?老年胆囊炎:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是最佳治疗方法吗?
Am Surg. 2001 Jul;67(7):637-40.
6
Cholecystectomy following acute presentation to a major New Zealand metropolitan hospital: change to the timing of surgery is needed.在新西兰一家大型都市医院急性发病后进行胆囊切除术:需要改变手术时机。
N Z Med J. 2006 Aug 4;119(1239):U2104.
7
Emergency cholecystostomy and subsequent cholecystectomy for acute gallstone cholecystitis in the elderly.老年急性结石性胆囊炎的急诊胆囊造瘘术及后续胆囊切除术
Br J Surg. 1999 Dec;86(12):1521-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01284.x.
8
Risk of emergency admission while awaiting elective cholecystectomy.等待择期胆囊切除术期间的急诊入院风险。
CMAJ. 2003 Sep 30;169(7):662-5.
9
Safety and success of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的安全性与成功率
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000 Aug;10(4):200-7.
10
Factors influencing waiting times for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.影响择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术等待时间的因素。
Can J Surg. 2007 Feb;50(1):34-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Pathway Reduces Elective Waiting Times and Preoperative Admissions: A Prospective Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术路径可减少择期等待时间和术前住院时间:一项前瞻性倾向匹配队列研究。
Med Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 27;13(3):86. doi: 10.3390/medsci13030086.
2
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis. When Do Risks Seem Imminent?急性胆囊炎的早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术。何时风险似乎迫在眉睫?
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;18(1):e70052. doi: 10.1111/ases.70052.
3
Emergency cholecystectomy: risk factors and impact of delay on electively booked patients, a 5-year experience of a tertiary care center.急诊胆囊切除术:危险因素及延误对择期手术患者的影响,一家三级医疗中心的5年经验
BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02694-8.
4
Telemedicine and Access to Elective Cholecystectomy for Socially Vulnerable Adults: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.远程医疗和社会弱势群体获得择期胆囊切除术的机会:一项试点随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438137. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38137.
5
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in severely comorbid patients with acute cholecystitis: results of a monocentric study.严重合并症急性胆囊炎患者早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术:单中心研究结果
Future Sci OA. 2024 May 14;10(1):FSO951. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2023-0185. eCollection 2024.
6
Measuring the impact of delayed access to elective cholecystectomy through patient's cost-utility: an observational cohort study.测量因选择性胆囊切除术延迟而导致的患者成本效益的影响:一项观察性队列研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Feb 8;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab018.
7
Cholecystectomy for Complicated Gallbladder and Common Biliary Duct Stones: Current Surgical Management.复杂性胆囊及胆总管结石的胆囊切除术:当前的手术治疗方法
Front Surg. 2020 Jul 21;7:42. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00042. eCollection 2020.
8
Clinical and operative outcomes of patients with acute cholecystitis who are treated initially with image-guided cholecystostomy.初始接受影像引导下胆囊造瘘术治疗的急性胆囊炎患者的临床及手术结局
Can J Surg. 2018 Jun;61(3):195-199. doi: 10.1503/cjs.003517.
9
Surgery Reduces Risk of Complications Even in High-Risk Veterans After Endoscopic Therapy for Biliary Stone Disease.手术可降低风险,即使对于内镜治疗胆道结石病后高危的退伍军人也是如此。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Mar;63(3):781-786. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-4940-8. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
10
Prolonged length of stay in delayed cholecystectomy is not due to intraoperative or postoperative contributors.延迟胆囊切除术中住院时间延长并非由术中或术后因素所致。
J Surg Res. 2017 Nov;219:253-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.100. Epub 2017 Jul 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机试验
Br J Surg. 1998 Jun;85(6):764-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00708.x.
2
Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis.腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术治疗急性坏疽性胆囊炎的随机试验
Lancet. 1998 Jan 31;351(9099):321-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08447-X.
3
Acute cholecystitis revisited: get it while it's hot.再谈急性胆囊炎:趁热打铁。
Ann Surg. 1998 Apr;227(4):468-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199804000-00002.
4
Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机研究。
Ann Surg. 1998 Apr;227(4):461-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199804000-00001.
5
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: prospective trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:前瞻性试验。
World J Surg. 1997 Jun;21(5):540-5. doi: 10.1007/pl00012283.
6
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. What is the optimal timing for operation?急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术。最佳手术时机是什么?
Arch Surg. 1996 May;131(5):540-4; discussion 544-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430170086016.
7
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is it really safe?腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:真的安全吗?
World J Surg. 1996 Jan;20(1):43-8; discussion 48-9. doi: 10.1007/s002689900008.
8
Immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy as definitive therapy for acute cholecystitis.急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术作为急性胆囊炎的确定性治疗方法。
Surg Endosc. 1995 Oct;9(10):1081-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00188991.
9
Laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜治疗
Am J Surg. 1993 Apr;165(4):508-14. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80951-1.
10
[Conventional or laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of acute cholecystitis?].[传统开腹胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的比较?]
Chirurg. 1994 Dec;65(12):1121-5.