Suppr超能文献

美国医疗保健研究与质量机构(ECRI)回应美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)关于Laerdal自动体外除颤器的安全警报。

ECRI responds to FDA Safety Alert on Laerdal automated external defibrillators.

出版信息

Health Devices. 1994 Jun;23(6):254-6.

PMID:7852073
Abstract

PROBLEM

On January 26, 1994, FDA issued a Safety Alert to directors of emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency healthcare provider organizations concerning automated external defibrillators (AEDs) manufactured by Laerdal Manufacturing Corp. The Safety Alert listed problems with three different Laerdal AED models: 1. Heartstart 1000 (Laerdal's fully automated unit): Failure to recognize and treat ventricular fibrillation. FDA did not provide a recommendation to prevent this problem, but requested that any deaths, serious injuries, or serious illnesses involving Laerdal defibrillators (or other devices) be reported. 2. Heartstart 1000s (a semiautomated version of the 1000): Delivery of a second, unnecessary shock after a normal sinus rhythm had been restored by a first shock. FDA recommended that users of this model check the patient for evidence of a pulse and breathing before allowing the machine to deliver a second or repeated shocks. 3. Heartstart 3000: Keypad malfunction, faulty battery connection, and defective optocoupler components. Other than recommending that all defibrillators, regardless of type or brand, be tested at the beginning of each shift and that they undergo all periodic maintenance recommended by the manufacturer, FDA did not provide specific recommendations to address these problems.

CONCLUSIONS

ECRI has several concerns with the FDA's Safety Alert: It does not adequately characterize the frequency or severity of the problems listed and provides a specific recommendation for only one. The specific recommendation provided for the Heartstart 1000s instructs EMS systems using this model to abandon established, successful practices and to adopt a new procedure that contradicts the American Heart Association's (AHA) protocol for AED use and could cause confusion and an increased risk of operator shock. It has caused enough concern that some EMS systems have taken Laerdal AEDs out of service or have hesitated to place new units into service. Unless alternative defibrillators are used, this will prevent patients from receiving the potentially lifesaving therapy of early defibrillation and can lead to unnecessary loss of life. The FDA Safety Alert is intended to raise the awareness of safe and effective use of medical devices; it does not have the force of law.

摘要

问题

1994年1月26日,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)向紧急医疗服务(EMS)主管及紧急医疗服务机构发布了一份关于Laerdal制造公司生产的自动体外除颤器(AED)的安全警报。该安全警报列出了三种不同型号的Laerdal AED存在的问题:1. Heartstart 1000(Laerdal的全自动设备):无法识别和治疗心室颤动。FDA未给出预防该问题的建议,但要求报告任何涉及Laerdal除颤器(或其他设备)的死亡、重伤或重病情况。2. Heartstart 1000s(1000的半自动版本):在第一次电击恢复正常窦性心律后,再次发出不必要的电击。FDA建议该型号的使用者在允许机器进行第二次或重复电击之前,检查患者的脉搏和呼吸迹象。3. Heartstart 3000:键盘故障、电池连接错误以及光耦合器部件有缺陷。除了建议所有除颤器,无论类型或品牌,在每班开始时进行测试,并按照制造商建议进行所有定期维护外,FDA未提供解决这些问题的具体建议。

结论

美国医疗保健研究与质量机构(ECRI)对FDA的安全警报有几点担忧:它没有充分描述所列问题的频率或严重程度,且仅针对其中一个问题提供了具体建议。为Heartstart 1000s提供的具体建议指示使用该型号的EMS系统放弃既定的、成功的做法,采用一种与美国心脏协会(AHA)的AED使用方案相矛盾的新程序,这可能会造成混乱并增加操作员电击的风险。它已经引起了足够的关注,以至于一些EMS系统已停用Laerdal AED,或在将新设备投入使用时犹豫不决。除非使用其他除颤器,否则这将使患者无法接受早期除颤这种可能挽救生命的治疗,并可能导致不必要的生命损失。FDA安全警报旨在提高对安全有效使用医疗设备的认识;它不具有法律效力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验