Health Devices. 1994 Jun;23(6):256-7.
In a Public Health Advisory issued on March 1, 1994 ("Avoiding Injuries from Rapid Drug or i.v. Fluid Administration Associated with i.v. Pumps and Rate Controller Devices"), FDA stated that it had received reports of injuries and deaths from uncontrolled, rapid infusion of medications and/or fluids associated with i.v. pumps and rate-control devices. The Advisory focuses on uncontrolled gravity flow, or what is commonly referred to as free-flow. However, it does not adequately describe free-flow protection mechanisms and makes suggestions that are misleading unwarranted, hazardous, or expensive to implement. One suggestion places patients at greater risk than the problem it is intended to prevent.
ECRI recommends against purchasing electronic infusion devices (EIDs) that do not have infusion set-based free-flow protection, and we provide conditions for use of EIDs with unprotected infusion sets in this article. We strongly disagree with the FDA's suggestion to limit drug concentration and see no substantiation for its suggestions to place warning labels on EIDs, use limited-volume reservoir chambers, or change the regular inspection and preventive maintenance (IPM) schedule. The FDA Public Health Advisory is intended to be used only as guidance; it does not have the force of law.
在1994年3月1日发布的一份公共卫生咨询报告(《避免与静脉输液泵和速率控制装置相关的快速药物或静脉输液导致的伤害》)中,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)指出,它已收到与静脉输液泵和速率控制装置相关的药物和/或液体不受控制的快速输注导致伤害和死亡的报告。该咨询报告关注的是不受控制的重力流,即通常所说的自由流动。然而,它没有充分描述自由流动保护机制,并且提出的建议具有误导性、不必要、危险或实施成本高昂。其中一项建议使患者面临的风险比其旨在预防的问题更大。
医疗保健研究与质量机构(ECRI)建议不要购买没有基于输液器的自由流动保护功能的电子输液装置(EID),并且我们在本文中提供了使用没有保护功能的输液器的EID的条件。我们强烈反对FDA关于限制药物浓度的建议,并且认为其在EID上张贴警告标签、使用有限容量储液腔或更改定期检查和预防性维护(IPM)计划的建议没有依据。FDA公共卫生咨询报告仅旨在用作指导;它不具有法律效力。