Capelouto C C, Clark P E, Ransil B J, Loughlin K R
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Urol. 1995 Mar;153(3 Pt 2):981-5.
High inguinal orchiectomy is the standard initial treatment for suspected testicular carcinoma. Nonstandard surgical approaches (scrotal violations), including scrotal orchiectomy, open testicular biopsy and fine needle aspiration, have historically been condemned as significantly compromising patient prognosis. Patients with scrotal violation are often subjected to potentially morbid or disfiguring local therapies. In addition, patients with scrotal violations are usually disqualified from surveillance protocols. A review was conducted of all published series of testicular cancer patients in whom scrotal violation occurred. A meta-analysis was then performed to choose a subset for critical analysis on the effect of scrotal violation on patient prognosis. Of 1,182 cases included in the final analysis scrotal violation occurred in 206. The rates for local recurrence, distant recurrence and survival were analyzed separately for all patients, patients with stage I disease and patients with pure seminoma or nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. Additionally, the effect of local treatment for scrotal violation on prognosis was examined. Although statistically significant differences were found in the local recurrence rate among the scrotal violation and inguinal group studies, the overall local recurrence rates were small (2.9% versus 0.4%, respectively). There were no statistical differences in distant recurrence or survival rates in all groups analyzed. Patients with scrotal violation who did not receive any local therapy fared as well as those who did receive local therapy. Although the standard treatment of primary testicular cancer remains high inguinal orchiectomy, these data suggest that scrotal violation does not impart a significantly worse overall prognosis. These data would also indicate that patients with stage I disease and scrotal violation should not necessarily be disqualified from surveillance protocols or subjected to adjuvant local therapy.
高位腹股沟睾丸切除术是疑似睾丸癌的标准初始治疗方法。包括阴囊睾丸切除术、开放性睾丸活检和细针穿刺在内的非标准手术方法(侵犯阴囊),在历史上一直被谴责为会严重影响患者预后。阴囊受侵犯的患者通常会接受可能导致病态或毁容的局部治疗。此外,阴囊受侵犯的患者通常不符合监测方案的要求。对所有已发表的出现阴囊受侵犯的睾丸癌患者系列进行了综述。然后进行了一项荟萃分析,以选择一个子集进行关键分析,探讨阴囊受侵犯对患者预后的影响。在最终分析纳入的1182例病例中,有206例出现了阴囊受侵犯。分别分析了所有患者、I期疾病患者以及纯精原细胞瘤或非精原细胞瘤性生殖细胞肿瘤患者的局部复发率、远处复发率和生存率。此外,还研究了针对阴囊受侵犯的局部治疗对预后的影响。虽然在阴囊受侵犯组和腹股沟组研究之间的局部复发率存在统计学上的显著差异,但总体局部复发率较低(分别为2.9%和0.4%)。在所有分析的组中,远处复发率或生存率没有统计学差异。未接受任何局部治疗的阴囊受侵犯患者与接受了局部治疗的患者预后相同。虽然原发性睾丸癌的标准治疗仍然是高位腹股沟睾丸切除术,但这些数据表明,阴囊受侵犯并不会导致总体预后明显更差。这些数据还表明,I期疾病且阴囊受侵犯的患者不一定不符合监测方案的要求或接受辅助局部治疗。