• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在施加特定的倾斜或转矩值时,对通过三种类型的预调矫治器在体外产生牙齿移动所需力量的比较。

A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement ex vivo through three types of pre-adjusted brackets when subjected to determined tip or torque values.

作者信息

Sims A P, Waters N E, Birnie D J

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, Royal Naval Hospital, Haslar, Gosport, Hampshire, U.K.

出版信息

Br J Orthod. 1994 Nov;21(4):367-73. doi: 10.1179/bjo.21.4.367.

DOI:10.1179/bjo.21.4.367
PMID:7857896
Abstract

Friction in fixed appliance systems has received considerable attention in recent literature, although that attributable to varying second order (tip) and third order (torque) adjustments in either the bracket or the archwire has not been fully investigated. The ex vivo study of 0.022 x 0.028-inch slot Minitwin, Activa, and Standard Straight Wire brackets investigates friction when known values of tip or torque were applied to 0.018 x 0.025-inch stainless steel wires. The resistance to sliding of the wire through the ligated brackets was measured on a vertically-mounted Instron testing machine. The results showed that the self-ligating Activa brackets consistently produced less friction than the other conventionally tied brackets. Minitwin brackets were slightly more resistant to movement than the Standard brackets during torquing, but the converse was found when tip was applied. Increasing tip and torque (ranges tested 0-6 degrees and 0-25 degrees, respectively) produced almost linear increases in friction for all brackets, although increasing tip had the more profound effect on friction, particularly in Activa brackets.

摘要

固定矫治系统中的摩擦力在最近的文献中受到了相当多的关注,尽管在托槽或弓丝中由于不同的二阶(倾斜)和三阶(转矩)调整所产生的摩擦力尚未得到充分研究。一项针对0.022×0.028英寸槽沟的Minitwin、Activa和标准直丝托槽的体外研究,在将已知的倾斜或转矩值施加于0.018×0.025英寸不锈钢丝时,对摩擦力进行了研究。通过垂直安装的英斯特朗试验机测量钢丝穿过结扎托槽的滑动阻力。结果表明,自锁式Activa托槽产生的摩擦力始终比其他传统结扎托槽小。在施加转矩时,Minitwin托槽比标准托槽对移动的阻力稍大,但在施加倾斜时情况则相反。增加倾斜和转矩(分别测试的范围为0 - 6度和0 - 25度)会使所有托槽的摩擦力几乎呈线性增加,尽管增加倾斜对摩擦力的影响更为显著,尤其是在Activa托槽中。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement ex vivo through three types of pre-adjusted brackets when subjected to determined tip or torque values.在施加特定的倾斜或转矩值时,对通过三种类型的预调矫治器在体外产生牙齿移动所需力量的比较。
Br J Orthod. 1994 Nov;21(4):367-73. doi: 10.1179/bjo.21.4.367.
2
A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation.使用两种自锁托槽和一种采用两种结扎方式的预调式托槽在体外产生牙齿移动所需力量的比较。
Eur J Orthod. 1993 Oct;15(5):377-85. doi: 10.1093/ejo/15.5.377.
3
A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures.两种自锁托槽和两种用弹性结扎丝结扎的预成直丝弓托槽摩擦特性的体外对比研究。
Eur J Orthod. 1998 Oct;20(5):589-96. doi: 10.1093/ejo/20.5.589.
4
Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets--a comparative study.传统结扎与自结扎金属托槽——一项对比研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):654-60. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn053. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
5
The effect of different combinations of tip and torque on archwire/bracket friction.托槽和扭矩的不同组合对弓丝/托槽摩擦力的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Oct;30(5):508-14. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn017. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
6
A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.自锁式与传统正畸托槽系统的比较。
Br J Orthod. 1997 Nov;24(4):309-17. doi: 10.1093/ortho/24.4.309.
7
Third-order torque and self-ligating orthodontic bracket-type effects on sliding friction.三阶扭矩和自锁正畸托槽类型对滑动摩擦的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2009 May;79(3):551-7. doi: 10.2319/022608-114.1.
8
Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review.不锈钢正畸托槽的扭矩表达。系统评价。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):201-10. doi: 10.2319/080508-352.1.
9
Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments.颊侧段正畸托槽与弓丝之间的摩擦力
Angle Orthod. 1996;66(3):215-22. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1996)066<0215:FRBOBA>2.3.CO;2.
10
Factors affecting friction in the pre-adjusted appliance.预调矫治器中影响摩擦力的因素。
Eur J Orthod. 2004 Dec;26(6):579-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.6.579.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Ligating Bracket Systems: A Comprehensive Review.自锁托槽系统:全面综述
Cureus. 2023 Sep 7;15(9):e44834. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44834. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Comparison of frictional resistance of esthetic and semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets.美观型和半美观型自锁托槽摩擦阻力的比较
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S116-20. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.155852.
3
Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study.弓丝与不同托槽系统之间摩擦阻力的比较:一项体外研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014 Jul;6(Suppl 1):S150-5. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.137429.
4
A comparative in-vivo evaluation of the alignment efficiency of 5 ligation methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial.5种结扎方法对齐效率的体内比较评估:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Eur J Dent. 2014 Jan;8(1):23-31. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.126236.
5
Frictional resistance of three types of ceramic brackets.三种类型陶瓷托槽的摩擦阻力
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2014 Jan 1;4(4):e3. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2013.4403. eCollection 2013 Oct.
6
Friction forces during sliding of various brackets for malaligned teeth: an in vitro study.各类矫治不齐牙齿托槽滑动时的摩擦力:一项体外研究。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:871423. doi: 10.1155/2013/871423. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
7
Treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss comparisons of self-ligating and conventional brackets.自锁托槽和传统托槽的治疗时间、疗效和支抗丢失比较。
Angle Orthod. 2013 Mar;83(2):280-5. doi: 10.2319/041912-326.1. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
8
Evaluation of the friction of self-ligating and conventional bracket systems.自锁托槽系统与传统托槽系统摩擦力的评估。
Eur J Dent. 2011 Jul;5(3):310-7.
9
Canine retraction rate with self-ligating brackets vs conventional edgewise brackets.带自锁托槽与传统方丝弓托槽的犬牙回收率比较。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Jul;80(4):438-45. doi: 10.2319/060809-322.1.