• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自锁式与传统正畸托槽系统的比较。

A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.

作者信息

Read-Ward G E, Jones S P, Davies E H

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, U.K.

出版信息

Br J Orthod. 1997 Nov;24(4):309-17. doi: 10.1093/ortho/24.4.309.

DOI:10.1093/ortho/24.4.309
PMID:9459030
Abstract

This ex-vivo study compared the static frictional resistance of three self-ligating brackets with a conventional steel-ligated Ultratrimm bracket. The effects of archwire size (0.020, 0.019 x 0.025 and 0.021 x 0.025-inch), bracket/archwire angulation (0, 5 and 10 degrees) and the presence of unstimulated human saliva were investigated. The study demonstrated that both increases in wire size and bracket/archwire angulation resulted in increased static frictional resistance for all bracket types tested, with the presence of saliva having an inconsistent effect. Mobil-Lock Variable-Slot had the least friction for all wires for 0 degree angulation. However, with the introduction of angulation, the values were comparable to those of the other brackets. Activa brackets had the second lowest frictional resistance, although high values were found with 0.019 x 0.025-inch wires. SPEED brackets demonstrated low forces with round wires, although with rectangular wires or in the presence of angulation, friction was greatly increased. Ultratrimm brackets produced large individual variation, confirming the difficulty in standardizing ligation force, although under certain conditions, significantly larger frictional forces were observed. In conclusion, self-ligating brackets showed reduced frictional resistance in comparison to steel ligated brackets only under certain conditions.

摘要

这项体外研究比较了三种自锁托槽与传统的金属结扎Ultratrimm托槽的静摩擦阻力。研究了弓丝尺寸(0.020、0.019×0.025和0.021×0.025英寸)、托槽/弓丝角度(0、5和10度)以及未刺激的人唾液的存在对其的影响。研究表明,对于所有测试的托槽类型,弓丝尺寸和托槽/弓丝角度的增加都会导致静摩擦阻力增加,而唾液的存在产生的影响并不一致。对于0度角度,Mobil-Lock可变槽在所有弓丝上的摩擦力最小。然而,随着角度的引入,其数值与其他托槽相当。Activa托槽的摩擦阻力第二低,尽管在使用0.019×0.025英寸弓丝时发现摩擦力较高。SPEED托槽在使用圆形弓丝时摩擦力较小,尽管在使用方形弓丝或存在角度时,摩擦力会大大增加。Ultratrimm托槽产生了较大的个体差异,证实了标准化结扎力的困难,尽管在某些条件下,观察到了明显更大的摩擦力。总之,自锁托槽仅在某些条件下比金属结扎托槽显示出更低的摩擦阻力。

相似文献

1
A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.自锁式与传统正畸托槽系统的比较。
Br J Orthod. 1997 Nov;24(4):309-17. doi: 10.1093/ortho/24.4.309.
2
Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.带有金属槽插入物的多晶陶瓷托槽的静摩擦阻力
Aust Orthod J. 2006 Nov;22(2):147-52.
3
Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.正畸托槽与弓丝之间的摩擦阻力:一项体外研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Mar 1;12(2):91-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1015.
4
Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.使用10种托槽模型对传统托槽和自锁托槽进行摩擦力测试。
Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):1041-5. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[1041:FOCASB]2.0.CO;2.
5
Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.自锁托槽与传统托槽在不同托槽-弓丝角度组合中的摩擦阻力。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Jun;22(3):228-34. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130665.
6
A comparative in vitro study of frictional resistance between lingual brackets and stainless steel archwires.一种舌侧托槽和不锈钢方丝之间摩擦力的体外对比研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Feb;34(1):119-25. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq180. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
7
Comparison of frictional resistance between self-ligating and conventional brackets tied with elastomeric and metal ligature in orthodontic archwires.正畸弓丝中自锁托槽与使用弹性结扎和金属结扎的传统托槽之间摩擦阻力的比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 May-Jun;19(3):114-9. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.114-119.oar.
8
An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.一项关于自锁托槽、低摩擦结扎丝和弓丝对摩擦力影响的体外研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Aug;29(4):390-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm007.
9
Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets--a comparative study.传统结扎与自结扎金属托槽——一项对比研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):654-60. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn053. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
10
Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.不同弓丝合金在主动和被动自锁托槽中摩擦力的比较评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Nov;136(5):675-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.034.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Ligating Versus Conventional Brackets: A Narrative Review.自锁托槽与传统托槽:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2025 Mar 31;17(3):e81499. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81499. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
The Mechanical and Clinical Properties of Customized Orthodontic Bracket Systems-A Comprehensive Review.定制正畸托槽系统的力学和临床性能——综述
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Oct 7;15(10):299. doi: 10.3390/jfb15100299.
3
Rotational Control and Retraction of Maxillary Canine Using Self-Ligating Empower Brackets: An Study.使用自结扎Empower托槽对上颌尖牙进行旋转控制和内收:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2072-S2074. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_24_24. Epub 2024 May 1.
4
Self-Ligating Bracket Systems: A Comprehensive Review.自锁托槽系统:全面综述
Cureus. 2023 Sep 7;15(9):e44834. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44834. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
A novel customized ceramic bracket for esthetic orthodontics: in vitro study.一种用于美学正畸的新型定制陶瓷托槽:体外研究。
Prog Orthod. 2019 Oct 14;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0292-y.
6
Oral health-related quality of life in orthodontic patients during initial therapy with conventional brackets or self-ligating brackets.使用传统托槽或自锁托槽进行初始治疗期间正畸患者的口腔健康相关生活质量
J Dent Sci. 2017 Jun;12(2):161-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
7
Static and kinetic frictional forces of silica-insert ceramic brackets with coated archwires in artificial saliva.人工唾液中带涂层弓丝的二氧化硅植入陶瓷托槽的静摩擦力和动摩擦力
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2017 Nov-Dec;14(6):412-417. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.218567.
8
Evaluation of force released by deflection of orthodontic wires in conventional and self-ligating brackets.传统矫治器和自锁矫治器中正畸弓丝弯曲释放力的评估。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Nov-Dec;21(6):91-97. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.6.091-097.oar.
9
Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.不同结扎系统的自锁托槽和传统托槽的摩擦行为
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0035-3. Epub 2016 May 24.
10
Comparative evaluation of anchorage loss between self-ligating appliance and Conventional pre-adjusted edgewise appliance using sliding mechanics - A retrospective study.使用滑动机制对自锁矫治器与传统预成方丝弓矫治器之间的支抗丧失进行比较评估——一项回顾性研究。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2015 Dec;71(Suppl 2):S362-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Apr 3.