Suppr超能文献

An explanation for discrepancy between angiographic and intravascular ultrasound measurements after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

作者信息

Nakamura S, Mahon D J, Maheswaran B, Gutfinger D E, Colombo A, Tobis J M

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Columbus Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Mar 1;25(3):633-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00453-W.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study attempted to determine why there is a discrepancy between angiographic and intravascular ultrasound measurements after coronary balloon angioplasty.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown a poor correlation between angiographic and intravascular ultrasound measurements after percutaneous coronary balloon angioplasty.

METHODS

After successful balloon angioplasty, 91 lesions in 84 patients were studied by intravascular ultrasound. Plaque morphology on intravascular ultrasound was classified as demonstrating a superficial injury if there was either no fracture or only a small tear that did not extend to the media versus a deep injury defined as the presence of a plaque fracture that reached the media. Measurements of minimal lumen diameter were compared between angiography and intravascular ultrasound.

RESULTS

On ultrasound imaging, a superficial injury pattern was observed in 44 lesions, whereas a deep injury was seen in 47 lesions. There were no statistical differences at baseline in patient or lesion characteristics. In the superficial injury group there was a significant correlation between angiography and intravascular ultrasound for minimal lumen diameter (r = 0.67) and lumen cross-sectional area (r = 0.69). In the deep injury group there was a poor correlation for minimal lumen diameter (r = 0.05) and lumen cross-sectional area (r = 0.28). After balloon angioplasty, the angiographic appearance showed a normal contour in 34%, the presence of dissection in 38% or a hazy appearance in 23%. On ultrasound imaging after angioplasty, the superficial injury group comprised 65% of lesions with a normal angiographic appearance and 67% of lesions with a hazy appearance, whereas 77% of lesions with an angiographic diagnosis of dissection were in the deep injury group by ultrasound (p = 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

These observations suggest that the discrepancies between angiographic and ultrasound measurements are due to differences in plaque morphology created by balloon dilation. Superficial injuries demonstrate similar results by angiography or ultrasound, whereas a deep injury to the plaque produces a difference in measurements between angiography and ultrasound. When angiography reveals a dissection, there is a high probability that intravascular ultrasound will demonstrate a plaque fracture extending to the media.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验