Hornberger J C, Habraken H, Bloch D A
Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305-5093.
Med Care. 1995 Mar;33(3):297-310. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199503000-00008.
Involving patients in their health care decisions improves patient satisfaction and outcomes, but can be costly because of the materials and time needed to discuss the many issues that constitute a medical problem. The authors present a framework for identifying the minimum data needed on patient preferences for accurate medical decision making. The method is illustrated for the decision of whether patients with end-stage renal disease should undergo short or long hemodialysis treatments. The value of health states to patients was modeled as a function of six outcomes: survival, uremic symptoms, hospital days per year, the inconvenience associated with long dialysis treatment duration, presence of hypotension during dialysis, and presence of other symptoms during dialysis. The relative importance of each outcome was characterized in a value function by weights referred to as preference-scaling factors. These factors were varied at random over a uniform distribution to simulate different patterns of patient preferences on the six outcomes. The decision model's recommendation was recorded for each simulation. Classification and regression-tree (CART) and stepwise logistic regression analyses were applied to these recommendations to determine the scaling-factor levels that predict short or long treatments. Knowledge of scaling factors on only the inconvenience of long dialysis treatment duration, the worst alive state of health on hemodialysis, and presence of hypotension identified the correct treatment in more than 97% of simulations. Fifty-five patients undergoing hemodialysis were then surveyed for their scaling factors on the six dimensions of well-being. When patients' scaling factors were applied to the predictive rule generated by CART using simulated scaling factors, more than 94% of treatment decisions were classified correctly--sensitivity and specificity of predicting long dialysis were 89% and 100%, respectively. These statistical techniques applied to results of a decision model help identify the minimum data needed on patient preferences to involve patients in efficient and accurate decisions about their health care.
让患者参与医疗决策可提高患者满意度并改善治疗效果,但由于讨论构成医疗问题的诸多事项所需的材料和时间,这可能成本高昂。作者提出了一个框架,用于确定准确医疗决策所需的关于患者偏好的最少数据。该方法通过终末期肾病患者应接受短期还是长期血液透析治疗的决策进行了说明。将健康状态对患者的价值建模为六个结果的函数:生存、尿毒症症状、每年住院天数、与长期透析治疗持续时间相关的不便、透析期间低血压的存在以及透析期间其他症状的存在。每个结果的相对重要性在一个价值函数中通过称为偏好缩放因子的权重来表征。这些因子在均匀分布上随机变化,以模拟患者对六个结果的不同偏好模式。记录每个模拟中决策模型的建议。将分类与回归树(CART)分析和逐步逻辑回归分析应用于这些建议,以确定预测短期或长期治疗的缩放因子水平。仅了解长期透析治疗持续时间的不便、血液透析中最差的存活健康状态以及低血压的存在等缩放因子,在超过97%的模拟中确定了正确的治疗方法。然后对55名接受血液透析的患者进行了调查,了解他们在幸福的六个维度上的缩放因子。当将患者的缩放因子应用于使用模拟缩放因子由CART生成的预测规则时,超过94%的治疗决策被正确分类——预测长期透析的敏感性和特异性分别为89%和100%。应用于决策模型结果的这些统计技术有助于确定关于患者偏好的最少数据,以便让患者参与有关其医疗保健的高效且准确的决策。