• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用焦点小组来确定对透析的担忧。选择研究。

Use of focus groups to identify concerns about dialysis. Choice Study.

作者信息

Bass E B, Jenckes M W, Fink N E, Cagney K A, Wu A W, Sadler J H, Meyer K B, Levey A S, Powe N R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1999 Jul-Sep;19(3):287-95. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900307.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X9901900307
PMID:10424835
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) may have quality-of-life (QOL) concerns that are not fully appreciated by their providers. The authors conducted focus groups with dialysis patients and dialysis professionals to determine whether this qualitative method would reveal differences between patients' and providers' views about: 1) domains of QOL that are affected by ESRD and dialysis; and 2) aspects of dialysis that affect QOL.

METHODS

Separate focus group discussions were held with: 8 adult hemodialysis patients (mean age 50 years; 3 women; mean duration of dialysis 8.5 years), 5 adult peritoneal dialysis patients (mean age 54 years; 3 women; mean duration of dialysis 4.6 years), 8 nephrologists (mean of 12 years of dialysis practice), and 9 other health professionals involved in dialysis care (3 nurses, 2 dietitians, 2 social workers, and 2 technicians; mean of 10 years experience in dialysis care). Discussions were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and reviewed independently by three investigators to identify and categorize distinct thoughts.

RESULTS

1,271 distinct thoughts were identified and grouped into 20 related categories, which included ten QOL domains and ten aspects of dialysis that affect QOL. Compared with the professionals, the patients identified one additional relevant QOL domain (10 vs 9), and one additional aspect of dialysis that affects QOL (10 vs 9), and expressed more thoughts per domain (p < 0.05), although the contents of their comments were frequently similar. Among QOL domains, the numbers of related thoughts identified by patients and professionals, respectively, were: freedom/control (60, 89); social relationships (36, 11); anxiety (37, 4); role function (24, 10); energy (12, 10); body image (16, 4); sex (11, 21); mental attitude (21, 0); sleep (15, 1), and cognitive function (13, 7). Among aspects of dialysis that affect QOL, the numbers of thoughts identified by patients and professionals were: general dialysis issues (159, 105); relationships with staff (62, 110); patient education (63, 68); diet (44, 40); scheduling (57, 3); vascular or peritoneal access issues (31, 17), adaptation to dialysis (16, 14); dialysis dose (18, 8); symptoms (25, 0), and self-care (5, 24).

CONCLUSIONS

Although health professionals have a good understanding of patient concerns about the effects of ESRD and dialysis, the focus group discussions revealed a breadth and depth of QOL concerns that they may not fully appreciate.

摘要

背景

终末期肾病(ESRD)患者可能存在一些生活质量(QOL)方面的问题,而其医疗服务提供者并未充分认识到这些问题。作者对透析患者和透析专业人员进行了焦点小组访谈,以确定这种定性方法是否能揭示患者和提供者在以下方面的观点差异:1)受ESRD和透析影响的生活质量领域;2)影响生活质量的透析方面。

方法

分别与以下人员进行了焦点小组讨论:8名成年血液透析患者(平均年龄50岁;3名女性;平均透析时间8.5年)、5名成年腹膜透析患者(平均年龄54岁;3名女性;平均透析时间4.6年)、8名肾病学家(平均透析治疗经验12年)以及9名参与透析护理的其他健康专业人员(3名护士、2名营养师、2名社会工作者和2名技术人员;平均透析护理经验10年)。讨论进行了录音,逐字转录,并由三名研究人员独立审查,以识别和分类不同的想法。

结果

共识别出1271个不同的想法,并将其归为20个相关类别,其中包括10个生活质量领域和10个影响生活质量的透析方面。与专业人员相比,患者识别出一个额外的相关生活质量领域(10个对9个)和一个额外的影响生活质量的透析方面(10个对9个),并且每个领域表达的想法更多(p < 0.05),尽管他们评论的内容通常相似。在生活质量领域中,患者和专业人员分别识别出的相关想法数量为:自由/控制(60个,89个);社会关系(36个,11个);焦虑(37个,4个);角色功能(24个,10个);精力(12个,10个);身体形象(16个,4个);性(11个,21个);精神态度(21个,0个);睡眠(15个,1个),以及认知功能(13个,7个)。在影响生活质量的透析方面,患者和专业人员识别出的想法数量为:一般透析问题(159个,105个);与工作人员的关系(62个,110个);患者教育(63个,68个);饮食(44个,40个);时间安排(57个,3个);血管或腹膜通路问题(31个,17个);适应透析(16个,14个);透析剂量(18个,8个);症状(25个,0个),以及自我护理(5个,24个)。

结论

尽管健康专业人员对患者关于ESRD和透析影响的担忧有较好的理解,但焦点小组讨论揭示了他们可能未充分认识到的生活质量担忧的广度和深度。

相似文献

1
Use of focus groups to identify concerns about dialysis. Choice Study.运用焦点小组来确定对透析的担忧。选择研究。
Med Decis Making. 1999 Jul-Sep;19(3):287-95. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900307.
2
Choice of treatment improves quality of life. A study on patients undergoing dialysis.治疗方法的选择可改善生活质量。一项针对透析患者的研究。
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Jun 23;157(12):1352-6.
3
Developing a health-related quality-of-life measure for end-stage renal disease: The CHOICE Health Experience Questionnaire.开发一种针对终末期肾病的健康相关生活质量测量方法:选择健康体验问卷。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2001 Jan;37(1):11-21. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.20631.
4
Psychosomatic aspects of patients on hemodialysis. 4. The relationship between quality of life and alexithymia.血液透析患者的身心问题。4. 生活质量与述情障碍之间的关系。
Psychother Psychosom. 1990;54(4):221-8. doi: 10.1159/000288399.
5
Perceived consequences of being a renal failure patient.作为肾衰竭患者所感受到的后果。
Nephrol Nurs J. 2000 Jun;27(3):291-7; discussion 298.
6
Patient and health care professional decision-making to commence and withdraw from renal dialysis: a systematic review of qualitative research.患者及医护人员关于开始和停止肾透析的决策:定性研究的系统评价
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jul 7;10(7):1201-15. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11091114. Epub 2015 May 5.
7
Quality of life in end stage renal disease: a multicentre comparative study.终末期肾病患者的生活质量:一项多中心比较研究。
West Indian Med J. 2009 Jun;58(3):235-42.
8
Content of a decision analysis for treatment choice in end-stage renal disease: who should be consulted?终末期肾病治疗选择的决策分析内容:应咨询谁?
Med Decis Making. 1994 Jan-Mar;14(1):91-7. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9401400111.
9
Dialysis-related factors affecting quality of life in patients on hemodialysis.影响血液透析患者生活质量的透析相关因素。
Iran J Kidney Dis. 2011 Jan;5(1):9-14.
10
Quality of life in patients on chronic dialysis in South Africa: a comparative mixed methods study.南非慢性透析患者的生活质量:一项比较性混合方法研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2017 Jan 5;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0425-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the kidney disease quality of life-36 (KDQOL-36) in Ethiopian patients undergoing hemodialysis.在接受血液透析的埃塞俄比亚患者中,肾脏病生活质量-36 问卷(KDQOL-36)的心理测量学特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Feb 10;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01932-y.
2
Improving Caregiver Burden by a Peer-Led Mentoring Program for Caregivers of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.通过同伴主导的指导计划减轻慢性肾病患者照顾者的负担:随机对照试验
J Patient Exp. 2022 Jan 27;9:23743735221076314. doi: 10.1177/23743735221076314. eCollection 2022.
3
The challenge of managing mild to moderate distress in patients with end stage renal disease: results from a multi-centre, mixed methods research study and the implications for renal service organisation.
管理终末期肾病患者轻度至中度困扰的挑战:一项多中心混合方法研究的结果及其对肾脏服务组织的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 23;19(1):989. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4808-4.
4
Distress in patients with end-stage renal disease: Staff perceptions of barriers to the identification of mild-moderate distress and the provision of emotional support.终末期肾病患者的痛苦:工作人员对轻度中度痛苦识别障碍及提供情感支持的看法。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 21;14(11):e0225269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225269. eCollection 2019.
5
Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with conservatively managed stage 5 chronic kidney disease: limitations of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36: SF-36.评估保守治疗的5期慢性肾病患者的健康相关生活质量:医学结局研究简表36(SF-36)的局限性
Qual Life Res. 2016 Nov;25(11):2799-2809. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1313-7. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
6
Improving clinical skills to support the emotional and psychological well-being of patients with end-stage renal disease: a qualitative evaluation of two interventions.提高临床技能以支持终末期肾病患者的情绪和心理健康:对两种干预措施的定性评估
Clin Kidney J. 2016 Jun;9(3):516-24. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw017. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
7
Renal replacement Therapy and Barriers to choice: using a Mixed Methods approach to explore the Patient's Perspective.肾脏替代疗法与选择障碍:运用混合方法探究患者视角
J Nephrol Soc Work. 2009 Winter;32:15-26.
8
Taking hospital treatments home: a mixed methods case study looking at the barriers and success factors for home dialysis treatment and the influence of a target on uptake rates.将医院治疗带回家:一项混合方法案例研究,探讨家庭透析治疗的障碍与成功因素以及目标对采用率的影响。
Implement Sci. 2015 Oct 27;10:148. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0344-8.
9
Comparison of life participation activities among adults treated by hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation: a systematic review.血液透析、腹膜透析和肾移植治疗的成年人的生活参与活动比较:系统评价。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Nov;62(5):953-73. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.03.022. Epub 2013 May 29.
10
Selecting renal replacement therapies: what do African American and non-African American patients and their families think others should know? A mixed methods study.选择肾脏替代疗法:非裔美国人和非裔美国患者及其家属认为其他人应该知道什么?一项混合方法研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2013 Jan 14;14:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-9.