Fellner F, Schmitt R, Trenkler J, Fellner C, Helmberger T, Obletter N, Böhm-Jurkovic H
Department of Neuroradiology, Oberösterreichische Landesnervenklinik, Linz, Austria.
Neuroradiology. 1994 Nov;36(8):591-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00600415.
Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic reliability of turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences compared to a conventional dual-echo spin-echo (SE) sequence in routine brain MRI at 1.0 T. The following demands were made on TSE sequences: acquisition time-reduction of at least 50% and true proton density (PD) contrast (low-signal cerebrospinal fluid). A conventional spin-echo and two single-echo TSE sequences were used in 150 patients, a dual-echo TSE sequence in addition in 50 patients. Demonstration of most anatomical structures and disorders was equivalent with TSE and SE sequences. Advantages of TSE were reduced flow artefacts on T2-weighted images, better lesion contrast on PD-weighted TSE images (especially in the dual-echo sequence) and acquisition time reduction to about 5 min (single-echo TSE) and 3:35 min (dual-echo TSE). Disadvantages of TSE were: reduced contrast of iron-containing substances such as haemosiderin and of areas of calcification. By virtue of the shorter acquisition time and diagnostic reliability dual-echo TSE proved the best sequence. If it is used with only one acquisition--whereby image quality but not diagnostic reliability is slightly decreased--acquisition time can be further reduced to 1:48 min. Application of a susceptibility-sensitive gradient-echo sequence, such as FLASH, compensates for the disadvantages mentioned above.
我们的目的是在1.0T常规脑磁共振成像中,评估快速自旋回波(TSE)序列与传统双回波自旋回波(SE)序列相比的诊断可靠性。对TSE序列提出以下要求:采集时间至少减少50%,并具有真正的质子密度(PD)对比(脑脊液呈低信号)。150例患者使用了传统自旋回波序列和两个单回波TSE序列,另外50例患者还使用了双回波TSE序列。TSE序列和SE序列对大多数解剖结构和病变的显示效果相当。TSE序列的优点包括:T2加权图像上血流伪影减少,PD加权TSE图像(尤其是双回波序列)上病变对比度更好,采集时间减少至约5分钟(单回波TSE)和3分35秒(双回波TSE)。TSE序列的缺点是:含铁血黄素等含铁物质以及钙化区域的对比度降低。由于采集时间较短且具有诊断可靠性,双回波TSE被证明是最佳序列。如果仅进行一次采集使用该序列(此时图像质量略有下降,但诊断可靠性不受影响),采集时间可进一步缩短至1分48秒。应用像FLASH这样的敏感性梯度回波序列可以弥补上述缺点。