Bifulco A, Brown G W, Harris T O
Department of Social Policy and Social Science, Royal Holloway College (University of London), U.K.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1994 Nov;35(8):1419-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01284.x.
The development of a retrospective, investigator-based interview measure of Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse (CECA) used with two community samples of adults in London is described. The component ratings are shown to have satisfactory inter-rater reliability and also validity as determined by agreement between sisters' independent accounts. The association between the different childhood scales is explored as well as the relationship of childhood experiences to adult depression. Methodological issues concerning investigator-based versus respondent-based measures of childhood are discussed and a case made for use of the former. Advantages of using the CECA, a retrospective, time-based measure of childhood, are outlined.
本文描述了一种基于研究者的回顾性访谈测量方法的开发过程，该方法用于测量童年期照料与虐待经历（CECA），并应用于伦敦的两个成年社区样本。研究表明，各分量表评分具有令人满意的评分者间信度，并且通过姐妹独立描述之间的一致性确定了效度。文中探讨了不同童年量表之间的关联，以及童年经历与成人抑郁之间的关系。讨论了关于基于研究者与基于受访者的童年测量方法的方法论问题，并论证了使用前者的理由。概述了使用CECA这种基于时间的童年回顾性测量方法的优点。
