Suppr超能文献

仰卧位正常受试者自主呼吸与正压呼吸的比较。

Comparison of spontaneous and positive-pressure breathing in supine normal subjects.

作者信息

Bynum L J, Wilson J E, Pierce A K

出版信息

J Appl Physiol. 1976 Sep;41(3):341-7. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1976.41.3.341.

Abstract

Distribution of ventilation (V) and perfusion (Q) was studied with 133Xe in eight supine, normal subjects comparing spontaneous breathing (SB) and intermittent positive-pressure breathing (IPPB). Tidal volume, inspiratory flow, and breathing frequency measured during SB were closely matched during automatically triggered IPPB. V and Q in the lung bases (adjacent to the diaphragm) were decreased relative to other regions during SB and further diminished by IPPB at similar volumes. During IPPB, basilar V and Q improved when tidal volume was increased; however; spontaneous hyperinflation resulted in significantly higher basilar V and Q than large tidal volumes delivered by IPPB. Thus, changes in lung volumes and gas exchange in the supine posture are attributable to impaired V and Q in the bases but not in dependent (posterior) regions. IPPB further reduces basilar V and Q, possibly due to loss of interdependence resulting from diminished respiratory muscle contraction. These findings may explain atelectasis during prolonged IPPB in supine patients. Although large tidal volumes improve basilar V during IPPB, spontaneous deep breaths are more effective and may prevent atelectasis better than IPPB at similar tidal volumes.

摘要

利用133Xe对8名仰卧位正常受试者的通气(V)和灌注(Q)分布进行了研究,比较了自主呼吸(SB)和间歇正压通气(IPPB)。在自主呼吸期间测量的潮气量、吸气流量和呼吸频率在自动触发的间歇正压通气期间紧密匹配。在自主呼吸期间,肺底部(靠近膈肌)的V和Q相对于其他区域降低,并且在相似容积下通过间歇正压通气进一步减少。在间歇正压通气期间,当潮气量增加时,底部的V和Q有所改善;然而,自主过度充气导致底部的V和Q显著高于间歇正压通气输送的大潮气量。因此,仰卧位时肺容积和气体交换的变化归因于底部而非依赖(后部)区域的V和Q受损。间歇正压通气进一步降低底部的V和Q,可能是由于呼吸肌收缩减弱导致相互依存关系丧失。这些发现可能解释了仰卧位患者长时间接受间歇正压通气期间的肺不张。尽管大潮气量在间歇正压通气期间可改善底部的V,但自主深呼吸更有效,并且在相似潮气量下可能比间歇正压通气更能预防肺不张。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验