Hotz J, Plein K
Allgemeines Krankenhaus Celle, Innere Medizin, Klinik für Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Freiburg.
Med Klin (Munich). 1994 Dec 15;89(12):645-51.
The importance of dietary fibres in treatment of irritable bowel syndrome increased during the last years. Yet the results of clinical studies on the different dietary fibres are not consistent. Therefore we decided to perform a controlled trial with a well defined group of patients to compare the effectiveness of wheat bran to psyllium seeds.
Thirty patients each with irritable bowel syndrome group II to III were treated in an open, not controlled study design either with 3 times 3.25 g psyllium seeds or 3 times 7 g wheat bran daily. All patients entering the study had not been treated for at least 3 weeks before. The study comprised two treatment phases of two weeks each, separated by two weeks without any treatment, thus leading to a study duration of 6 weeks altogether. Parameters for evaluation were stool frequency and consistency and the symptoms pain and abdominal distention, measured by a score (1 to 4).
In both treatments groups stool frequency and consistency improved apparently compared to the starting point or the two weeks treatment free time in between. The improvement of stool frequency was statistically significant (p < 0.0001) for both substances. Furthermore the effect of psyllium seeds exceeded that of wheat bran statistically significant in week 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 (p < 0.005). Other symptoms such as abdominal pain improved too by therapy, psyllium seeds again tending to show better results. A significant difference between both substances could be observed on the symptom abdominal distension. Whereas abdominal distension decreased under treatment with psyllium seeds it increased with wheat brain. This lead to discontinuation of the study in 5 cases, 3 of which could be changed successfully to psyllium seeds. The difference between psyllium seeds and wheat bran concerning the occurrence of abdominal distension was statistically significant (p < 0.01).
The results of this study demonstrate the effectiveness of psyllium seeds and wheat bran on stool frequency and consistency of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Psyllium seeds showed to be superior to wheat brain with respect to stool frequency and abdominal distension so that it should be preferred in treatment of irritable bowel syndrome and constipation.
在过去几年中,膳食纤维在肠易激综合征治疗中的重要性日益增加。然而,关于不同膳食纤维的临床研究结果并不一致。因此,我们决定对一组明确的患者进行对照试验,以比较麦麸与车前草籽的疗效。
30例肠易激综合征II至III级的患者采用开放、非对照研究设计,每天服用3次3.25克车前草籽或3次7克麦麸。所有进入研究的患者在至少3周前未接受过治疗。该研究包括两个为期两周的治疗阶段,中间间隔两周不进行任何治疗,因此研究总时长为6周。评估参数包括大便频率和稠度以及疼痛和腹胀症状,通过评分(1至4分)进行测量。
与起始点或中间两周的无治疗期相比,两个治疗组的大便频率和稠度均有明显改善。两种物质在大便频率改善方面均具有统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。此外,在第1、2、3、5和6周,车前草籽的效果在统计学上显著超过麦麸(p < 0.005)。其他症状如腹痛也通过治疗得到改善,车前草籽的效果再次趋于更好。在腹胀症状上,两种物质之间存在显著差异。车前草籽治疗时腹胀减轻,而麦麸治疗时腹胀增加。这导致5例患者退出研究,其中3例成功改用了车前草籽。车前草籽和麦麸在腹胀发生率方面的差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。
本研究结果表明,车前草籽和麦麸对肠易激综合征患者的大便频率和稠度有效。在大便频率和腹胀方面,车前草籽优于麦麸,因此在肠易激综合征和便秘的治疗中应优先选用。