• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进骑行对公众健康的益处。

Promoting the public health benefits of cycling.

作者信息

Unwin N C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne.

出版信息

Public Health. 1995 Jan;109(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(95)80074-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0033-3506(95)80074-3
PMID:7871145
Abstract

The potential health gain from increased levels of cycling in Britain is large. This paper reviews current levels of bicycle ownership and use, and the factors which influence whether or not people choose to cycle in Britain. Cycle ownership is strongly associated with affluence and children. Males cycle more than females. Boys aged 11-15 years cycle the greatest number of miles per person per week, followed by men aged 16-59 years. Cycling to work is weakly associated with affluence. Modelling cycling to work patterns suggests that hilliness, traffic danger, rainfall and longer trip lengths are important deterrents to cycling. Cyclists identify cheapness, health, convenience and enjoyment as reasons for cycling. Non-cyclists identify danger, 'unpleasantness' (e.g. traffic fumes, weather), bike security and cycling not appealing as reasons for not cycling. Part of the lack of appeal of cycling reflects negative social attitudes towards cycling. Cycling has tended to be seen as a childhood activity and incompatible with an attractive and sophisticated image. Departments of Public Health Medicine and Health Promotion, in collaboration with other sectors, have an important role to play in promoting increased levels of cycling.

摘要

在英国,骑行水平的提高有望给健康带来巨大益处。本文回顾了英国目前的自行车拥有量和使用情况,以及影响人们是否选择骑车的因素。自行车拥有量与富裕程度和儿童密切相关。男性骑车的人数多于女性。11至15岁的男孩每周人均骑行里程数最多,其次是16至59岁的男性。骑车上班与富裕程度的关联较弱。对骑车上班模式的建模表明,坡度、交通危险、降雨以及较长的出行距离是骑车的重要阻碍因素。骑车者认为便宜、健康、便利和乐趣是骑车的理由。不骑车者则认为危险、“不愉快”(如交通废气、天气)、自行车安全以及骑车缺乏吸引力是不骑车的理由。骑车缺乏吸引力的部分原因在于社会对骑车持负面态度。骑车往往被视为一种儿童活动,与有吸引力和精致的形象不相容。公共卫生医学和健康促进部门与其他部门合作,在促进骑行水平提高方面可发挥重要作用。

相似文献

1
Promoting the public health benefits of cycling.促进骑行对公众健康的益处。
Public Health. 1995 Jan;109(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(95)80074-3.
2
Cyclists' attitudes toward policies encouraging bicycle travel: findings from the Taupo Bicycle Study in New Zealand.新西兰陶波自行车研究:鼓励自行车出行政策下的自行车骑行者态度。
Health Promot Int. 2010 Mar;25(1):54-62. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap041. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
3
Key influences on motivations for utility cycling (cycling for transport to and from places).影响实用骑行动机(即骑车往返于各地点的出行目的)的主要因素。
Health Promot J Austr. 2013 Dec;24(3):227-33. doi: 10.1071/HE13062.
4
Fatal cycling injuries.致命的自行车事故伤害
Sports Med. 1995 Nov;20(5):348-62. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199520050-00006.
5
Evaluation of an alternative transport initiative in Perth, Western Australia, 2000-04.2000 - 2004年西澳大利亚珀斯一项替代交通倡议的评估
Health Promot J Austr. 2005 Dec;16(3):184-8. doi: 10.1071/he05184.
6
Promoting transportation cycling for women: the role of bicycle infrastructure.促进女性骑行:自行车基础设施的作用。
Prev Med. 2008 Jan;46(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.010. Epub 2007 Jul 17.
7
Use of and short-term impacts of new cycling infrastructure in inner-Sydney, Australia: a quasi-experimental design.澳大利亚悉尼市中心新自行车道设施的使用情况及其短期影响:一项准实验设计
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Oct 6;12:129. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0294-1.
8
Health Promotion as a Motivational Factor in Alpine Cycling.促进健康作为高山自行车运动的激励因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;18(5):2321. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052321.
9
Utilitarian cycling in Belgium: a cross-sectional study in a sample of regular cyclists.比利时的功利性骑行:一项针对经常骑车者样本的横断面研究。
J Phys Act Health. 2014 Jul;11(5):884-94. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0200. Epub 2013 May 10.
10
A push for public health: the effect of e-bikes on physical activity levels.推动公共卫生:电动自行车对身体活动水平的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Oct 16;17(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4817-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Did air pollution continue to affect bike share usage in Seoul during the COVID-19 pandemic?在新冠疫情期间,空气污染是否继续影响首尔的共享单车使用情况?
J Transp Health. 2022 Mar;24:101342. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101342. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
2
Predicting Blood Lactate Concentration and Oxygen Uptake from sEMG Data during Fatiguing Cycling Exercise.在疲劳骑行运动期间根据表面肌电图数据预测血乳酸浓度和摄氧量
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Aug 19;15(8):20480-500. doi: 10.3390/s150820480.
3
Cycling, physical exercise, and the millennium fund.骑行、体育锻炼与千年基金。
BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):344. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.344.