Schmitt E, Kruse A, Olbrich E
Institut für Psychologie, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald.
Z Gerontol. 1994 Nov-Dec;27(6):390-8.
In a study on the chances and limits of independent living in old age, we collected data about difficulties in 23 activities of daily living in two sub-samples: participants from the western part of Germany (n = 745), and from the eastern part of Germany (n = 347). Participants were grouped into three patterns of competence by means of cluster analysis. Cluster analyses were calculated separately for participants in the western and eastern parts of Germany. In both sub-samples, we found three patterns of competence: "High competence in most activities of daily living", "reduced competence in some activities of daily living" and "reduced competence in most activities of daily living". Patterns of competence were similar in the sub-samples, but important differences were found in some activities of daily living between participants from the eastern and western parts of Germany (e.g., in "heating home," "washing clothes," "banking"). These differences were due to unfavorable conditions in physical environment. Analysis of the relationship between objective housing conditions (assessed by our research team) and patterns of competence strongly supported this interpretation. Participants in the two sub-samples were more satisfied with their housing conditions as could be expected from our assessment of housing conditions. Successful adaptation to environmental conditions and changes in the aspiration-level can explain these differences. The degree of satisfaction with housing conditions is only a poor predictor for possibilities in increasing competence by intervention and rehabilitation. Most participants wished to keep their household independently as long as possible. Acceptance for homes for the elderly was low.
在一项关于老年人独立生活的机会与局限的研究中,我们在两个子样本中收集了有关23项日常生活活动困难的数据:来自德国西部的参与者(n = 745)和来自德国东部的参与者(n = 347)。通过聚类分析将参与者分为三种能力模式。分别对德国西部和东部的参与者进行聚类分析。在两个子样本中,我们都发现了三种能力模式:“大多数日常生活活动能力高”、“某些日常生活活动能力下降”和“大多数日常生活活动能力下降”。两个子样本中的能力模式相似,但在德国东部和西部参与者的一些日常生活活动中发现了重要差异(例如,在“家庭供暖”、“洗衣服”、“银行业务”方面)。这些差异是由于物理环境中的不利条件造成的。对客观住房条件(由我们的研究团队评估)与能力模式之间关系的分析有力地支持了这一解释。两个子样本中的参与者对其住房条件的满意度高于我们对住房条件评估所预期的水平。成功适应环境条件和期望水平的变化可以解释这些差异。住房条件的满意度程度对于通过干预和康复提高能力的可能性而言只是一个较差的预测指标。大多数参与者希望尽可能长时间地独立维持家庭。对养老院的接受度较低。