Isawa T, Teshima T, Anazawa Y, Miki M, Soni P S
Department of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai 980, Japan.
Clin Nucl Med. 1994 Dec;19(12):1085-90. doi: 10.1097/00003072-199419120-00010.
Exactly how the pulmonary distribution of inhaled radioactive gas and Technegas, or ultra-small aerosol particulates, differs from each other, is still uncertain. The authors compared the distribution of inhaled Kr-81 m gas and Technegas in the lungs at total lung capacity in 13 control subjects with no clinical conditions and 13 patients with various chest diseases. In normal lungs, there was no difference in the distribution ratios in the right and left lungs between inhaled Kr-81m gas and Technegas. However, there was a significant difference in the lungs of patients with pulmonary disease. Technegas tended to deposit more in the lung bases than did Kr-81m gas. Despite these statistical differences, they were visually, or qualitatively, similar. From a practical and clinical standpoint, Technegas seems to be useful as an inhalation agent, unless quantitative analyses are required.
