Sigal M
Lev Hasharon Mental Health Medical Center, Netanya, Israel.
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1994;31(4):254-60.
The case described in this paper is the basis of two verdicts, which are very important case law precedents. These verdicts, given in connection with the new law for the treatment of the mentally ill, clarify the framework in which involuntary hospitalization in Israel is implemented. These verdicts exemplify the shifting of authority, on the issue of commitment, from the medical model to a more judicial one. Although the first step in the commitment system is still performed by a physician (the district psychiatrist), the entire system is now under strict judicial supervision, and the legal procedure is of utmost importance.
本文所述案例是两项裁决的依据,这两项裁决是非常重要的判例法先例。这些与新的精神疾病治疗法相关的裁决,阐明了以色列实施非自愿住院治疗的框架。这些裁决体现了在强制住院问题上,权力从医学模式向更具司法性的模式的转变。尽管强制住院系统的第一步仍然由医生(地区精神病医生)执行,但整个系统现在受到严格的司法监督,法律程序至关重要。