• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Efficacy of common broad spectrum anthelmintics against hook worm, Ascaris and Trichiuris in Hat Yai district, Songkhla Province, Thailand.

作者信息

Phuvanandh D, Dulyapiree Y, Chatisiri J, Panrong A, Tanskul P, Phuvanandh M

机构信息

Hat Yai Regional Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 1994 Jul;77(7):357-62.

PMID:7876753
Abstract
  1. The third therapeutic scheme should be used in the hospital. 2. The second and third therapeutic scheme may be used in mass treatment. 3. The 4th-6th therapeutic scheme is to be considered, reviewed, and evaluated. 4. Model and technology of permanent worms control is to be studied. 5. The treatment and control of Ascaris were simple. Cure with low reinfection rate and long reinfection period was remarkable. 6. The prevalence rate and reinfection rate of Trichiuris was high, and not so sensitive to any antelmintics. 7. The reinfection rate in the second group was not superior to the first group and the third group. This revealed no effectiveness of ovicidal and larvicidal on the helminthiasis. 8. Reinfection rate in the third therapeutic scheme was the least group. 9. Toxicity and side effect were not found in any anthelmintics. 10. Broad Spectrum Anthelmintics are necessary in mass treatment or blind treatment.
摘要

相似文献

1
Efficacy of common broad spectrum anthelmintics against hook worm, Ascaris and Trichiuris in Hat Yai district, Songkhla Province, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 1994 Jul;77(7):357-62.
2
[Treatment of soil-transmitted helminth infections by anthelmintics in current use].[当前使用的驱虫药治疗土源性蠕虫感染]
Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi. 1992;10(2):95-9.
3
Cure and reinfection patterns of geohelminthic infections after treatment in communities inhabiting the tropical rainforest of Assam, India.印度阿萨姆邦热带雨林地区社区人群治疗后土源性蠕虫感染的治愈及再感染模式
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2004 Sep;35(3):512-7.
4
Controlled comparative study of the efficacy of pyrantel pamoate and a combined regimen of piperazine citrate and bephenium hydroxynaphthoate in the treatment of intestinal nemathelminthiases.噻嘧啶与枸橼酸哌嗪和羟萘酸苄酚宁联合方案治疗肠道线虫病疗效的对照比较研究
Afr J Med Med Sci. 1981 Mar-Jun;10(1-2):63-7.
5
Efficacy of current drugs against soil-transmitted helminth infections: systematic review and meta-analysis.现有药物治疗土源性蠕虫感染的疗效:系统评价与荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2008 Apr 23;299(16):1937-48. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.16.1937.
6
Comparative trials using albendazole and mebendazole in the treatment of soil-transmitted helminths in schoolchildren on Penang, Malaysia.在马来西亚槟城,使用阿苯达唑和甲苯达唑治疗学童土壤传播蠕虫的对比试验。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1996 Dec;27(4):765-7.
7
Mebendazole and pyrantel pamoate as broad-spectrum anthelmintics.甲苯咪唑和噻嘧啶双羟萘酸盐作为广谱驱虫药。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1976 Mar(1):81-4.
8
Efficacy and safety of albendazole plus ivermectin, albendazole plus mebendazole, albendazole plus oxantel pamoate, and mebendazole alone against Trichuris trichiura and concomitant soil-transmitted helminth infections: a four-arm, randomised controlled trial.阿苯达唑联合伊维菌素、阿苯达唑联合甲苯达唑、阿苯达唑联合奥苯达唑、甲苯达唑单独治疗鞭虫和同时感染的土壤传播性蠕虫感染的疗效和安全性:一项四臂随机对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Mar;15(3):277-84. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71050-3. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
9
Efficacy of mebendazole and albendazole for Ascaris lumbricoides and hookworm infections in an area with long time exposure for antihelminthes, Northwest Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚西北部长期接触抗蠕虫药物的地区,甲苯咪唑和阿苯达唑治疗蛔虫和钩虫感染的疗效
Ethiop Med J. 2007 Jul;45(3):301-6.
10
A comparative study on the efficacy of albendazole and mebendazole in the treatment of ascariasis, hookworm infection and trichuriasis.阿苯达唑与甲苯达唑治疗蛔虫病、钩虫感染和鞭虫病疗效的比较研究。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1993 Dec;24(4):724-9.