Suppr超能文献

使用频谱分析来检验关于鳍足类动物起源的假设。

Use of spectral analysis to test hypotheses on the origin of pinnipeds.

作者信息

Lento G M, Hickson R E, Chambers G K, Penny D

机构信息

Biochemistry and Genetics Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Jan;12(1):28-52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040189.

Abstract

The evolutionary origin of the pinnipeds (seals, sea lions, and walruses) is still uncertain. Most authors support a hypothesis of a monophyletic origin of the pinnipeds from a caniform carnivore. A minority view suggests a diphyletic origin with true seals being related to the mustelids (otters and ferrets). The phylogenetic relationships of the walrus to other pinniped and carnivore families are also still particularly problematic. Here we examined the relative support for mono- and diphyletic hypotheses using DNA sequence data from the mitochondrial small subunit (12S) rRNA and cytochrome b genes. We first analyzed a small group of taxa representing the three pinniped families (Phocidae, Otariidae, and Odobenidae) and caniform carnivore families thought to be related to them. We inferred phylogenetic reconstructions from DNA sequence data using standard parsimony and neighbor-joining algorithms for phylogenetic inference as well as a new method called spectral analysis (Hendy and Penny) in which phylogenetic information is displayed independently of any selected tree. We identified and compensated for potential sources of error known to lead to selection of incorrect phylogenetic trees. These include sampling error, unequal evolutionary rates on lineages, unequal nucleotide composition among lineages, unequal rates of change at different sites, and inappropriate tree selection criteria. To correct for these errors, we performed additional transformations of the observed substitution patterns in the sequence data, applied more stringent structural constraints to the analyses, and included several additional taxa to help resolve long, unbranched lineages in the tree. We find that there is strong support for a monophyletic origin of the pinnipeds from within the caniform carnivores, close to the bear/raccoon/panda radiation. Evidence for a diphyletic origin was very weak and can be partially attributed to unequal nucleotide compositions among the taxa analyzed. Subsequently, there is slightly more evidence for grouping the walrus with the eared seals versus the true seals. A more conservative interpretation, however, is that the walrus is an early, but not the first, independent divergence from the common pinniped ancestor.

摘要

鳍足类动物(海豹、海狮和海象)的进化起源仍然不确定。大多数作者支持鳍足类动物起源于犬形食肉动物的单系起源假说。少数观点认为是双系起源,即真海豹与鼬科动物(水獭和雪貂)有关。海象与其他鳍足类动物和食肉动物科之间的系统发育关系也仍然特别成问题。在这里,我们使用线粒体小亚基(12S)rRNA和细胞色素b基因的DNA序列数据,研究了对单系和双系假说的相对支持情况。我们首先分析了一小类代表三个鳍足类科(海豹科、海狮科和海象科)以及被认为与它们相关的犬形食肉动物科的分类群。我们使用标准简约法和邻接法等系统发育推断算法以及一种名为光谱分析(亨迪和彭尼)的新方法,从DNA序列数据中推断系统发育重建,在光谱分析中,系统发育信息独立于任何选定的树进行展示。我们识别并补偿了已知会导致选择错误系统发育树的潜在误差来源。这些包括抽样误差、谱系上不平等的进化速率、谱系间不平等的核苷酸组成、不同位点上不平等的变化速率以及不适当的树选择标准。为了纠正这些误差,我们对序列数据中观察到的替换模式进行了额外的转换,对分析应用了更严格的结构限制,并纳入了几个额外的分类群,以帮助解析树中长的、无分支的谱系。我们发现,有强有力的证据支持鳍足类动物起源于犬形食肉动物内部的单系起源,接近熊/浣熊/熊猫的辐射分支。双系起源的证据非常薄弱,部分原因可归因于所分析分类群之间不平等的核苷酸组成。随后,将海象与有耳海豹归为一组而非与真海豹归为一组的证据略多一些。然而,一种更保守的解释是,海象是从鳍足类动物共同祖先中早期但并非第一个独立分化出来的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验