Johnson N F
Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Oct;102 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):97-102. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102s597.
The dissolution rate of glass fibers has been shown to be pH sensitive using in vitro lung fluid simulant models. The current study investigated whether there is a difference in phagosomal pH (ppH) between rat alveolar macrophages (AM) and rat nasal epithelial cells (RNEC) and whether such a difference would influence the dissolution of glass fibers. The ppH was measured in cultured AM and RNEC using flow cytometric, fluorescence-emission rationing techniques with fluorescein-labeled, amorphous silica particles. Glass fiber dissolution was determined in AM and RNEC cultured for 3 weeks with fast dissolving glass fibers (GF-A) or slow dissolving ones (GF-B). The mean diameters of GF-A were 2.7 microns and of GF-B, 2.6 microns, the average length of both fibers was approximately 22 to 25 microns. Dissolution was monitored by measuring the length and diameter of intracellular fibers and estimating the volume, assuming a cylindrical morphology. The ppH of AM was 5.2 to 5.8, and the ppH of RNEC was 7.0 to 7.5. The GF-A dissolved more slowly in RNEC than in AM, and no dissolution was evident in either cell type with GF-B. The volume loss with GF-A after a 3-week culture with AM was 66% compared to 45% for cultured RNEC. These results are different from those obtained using in vitro lung fluid-simulant models where dissolution is faster at higher pH. This difference suggests that dissolution rates of glass fibers in AM should not be applied to the dissolution of fibers in epithelial cells.
使用体外肺液模拟模型已表明玻璃纤维的溶解速率对pH敏感。本研究调查了大鼠肺泡巨噬细胞(AM)和大鼠鼻上皮细胞(RNEC)之间吞噬体pH(ppH)是否存在差异,以及这种差异是否会影响玻璃纤维的溶解。使用流式细胞术、荧光发射定量技术和荧光素标记的无定形二氧化硅颗粒,在培养的AM和RNEC中测量ppH。用快速溶解的玻璃纤维(GF-A)或慢速溶解的玻璃纤维(GF-B)对AM和RNEC进行3周培养后,测定玻璃纤维的溶解情况。GF-A的平均直径为2.7微米,GF-B的平均直径为2.6微米,两种纤维的平均长度约为22至25微米。通过测量细胞内纤维的长度和直径并假设其为圆柱形形态来估计体积,从而监测溶解情况。AM的ppH为5.2至5.8,RNEC的ppH为7.0至7.5。GF-A在RNEC中的溶解速度比在AM中慢,并且在两种细胞类型中,GF-B均未观察到明显溶解。与培养的RNEC的45%相比,AM培养3周后GF-A的体积损失为66%。这些结果与使用体外肺液模拟模型获得的结果不同,在体外肺液模拟模型中,较高pH下溶解速度更快。这种差异表明,玻璃纤维在AM中的溶解速率不适用于上皮细胞中纤维的溶解。