• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日托中心残疾儿童与非残疾儿童受伤情况对比。

Comparison of injuries to children with and without disabilities in a day-care center.

作者信息

Leland N L, Garrard J, Smith D K

机构信息

School of Public Health, Division of Health Management and Policy, University of Minnesota.

出版信息

J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1994 Dec;15(6):402-8.

PMID:7884010
Abstract

Injury rates and characteristics of children with and without disabilities in separate day-care programs were studied retrospectively through a record review of injury logs. The study focused on three issues: (1) initial injury rates and multiple injury rates, with comparisons by gender and program; (2) the characteristics of children who were injured compared to those who were not injured; and (3) comparisons between programs on characteristics and consequences of injuries. Injury rates were calculated on the basis of children's exposure time in the day-care setting. Results showed that children with disabilities had higher rates of injury than those without disabilities. Injury prevention in day care should be tailored to the characteristics of children and the types of injuries that occur in this setting.

摘要

通过对伤害日志的记录回顾,对分别参加日托项目的残疾儿童和非残疾儿童的伤害发生率及特征进行了回顾性研究。该研究聚焦于三个问题:(1)初始伤害发生率和多重伤害发生率,并按性别和项目进行比较;(2)受伤儿童与未受伤儿童的特征对比;(3)各项目在伤害特征和后果方面的比较。伤害发生率是根据儿童在日托环境中的暴露时间计算得出的。结果显示,残疾儿童的伤害发生率高于非残疾儿童。日托机构的伤害预防应根据儿童的特征以及该环境中发生的伤害类型进行调整。

相似文献

1
Comparison of injuries to children with and without disabilities in a day-care center.日托中心残疾儿童与非残疾儿童受伤情况对比。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1994 Dec;15(6):402-8.
2
A nationwide study of the risk of injury associated with day care center attendance.一项关于日托中心出勤相关受伤风险的全国性研究。
Pediatrics. 1994 Mar;93(3):364-8.
3
How safe are day care centers? Day care versus home injuries among children in Norway.日托中心有多安全?挪威儿童在日托中心与在家中受伤情况对比。
Pediatrics. 1996 Jan;97(1):43-7.
4
Prevalence and prognostic factors of disability after childhood injury.儿童期受伤后残疾的患病率及预后因素。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):e810-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1035.
5
Disabling injuries to childcare workers in Minnesota, 1985 to 1990. An analysis of potential risk factors.1985年至1990年明尼苏达州儿童保育员的致残性伤害。潜在风险因素分析。
J Occup Med. 1993 Dec;35(12):1236-43.
6
Annual report on health care for children and youth in the United States: focus on injury-related emergency department utilization and expenditures.美国儿童和青少年医疗保健年度报告:关注与伤害相关的急诊科就诊情况及支出
Ambul Pediatr. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):219-240.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.03.032. Epub 2008 May 27.
7
Farm accidents in children: eleven years of experience.儿童农场事故:十一年的经验
J Pediatr Surg. 2001 May;36(5):726-9. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.22946.
8
Injury among 1107 Canadian students with self-identified disabilities.1107名自我认定有残疾的加拿大学生中的伤害情况。
Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Nov 30;29(22):1727-35. doi: 10.1080/09638280601129231.
9
Injuries among US adults with disabilities.美国成年残疾人中的伤害情况。
Epidemiology. 2008 May;19(3):465-71. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31816932ba.
10
Does time spent in child care influence risk for unintentional injury?在儿童保育机构度过的时间会影响意外伤害风险吗?
J Pediatr Psychol. 2006 Mar;31(2):184-93. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj007. Epub 2005 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Injury in Children with Developmental Disorders: A 1:1 Nested Case-Control Study Using Multiple Datasets in Taiwan.儿童发育障碍相关损伤:基于台湾多个数据集的 1:1 巢式病例对照研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 9;19(16):9814. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169814.
2
Day care as a strategy for drowning prevention in children under 6 years of age in low- and middle-income countries.日间护理作为预防低、中收入国家 6 岁以下儿童溺水的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 22;4(4):CD014955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014955.
3
Unintentional injuries in children with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
残疾儿童的意外伤害:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Inj Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;2(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40621-015-0053-4. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
4
Unintentional injuries among Chinese children with different types and severity of disability.中国不同类型和严重程度残疾儿童的非故意伤害。
Ann Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;24(1):23-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.10.015. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
5
We all failed the Latimers.
Paediatr Child Health. 1998 May;3(3):153-4.
6
An Evolution of Virtual Reality Training Designs for Children With Autism and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders.针对自闭症和胎儿酒精谱系障碍儿童的虚拟现实训练设计的演变
Top Lang Disord. 2007 Jul 1;27(3):226-241. doi: 10.1097/01.tld.0000285357.95426.72.
7
Injuries among US children with different types of disabilities.美国不同类型残疾儿童的受伤情况。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1510-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.097097. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
8
Wheelchair related injuries treated in US emergency departments.在美国急诊科接受治疗的与轮椅相关的损伤。
Inj Prev. 2006 Feb;12(1):8-11. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.010033.
9
Nonfatal injuries among US children with disabling conditions.美国残疾儿童中的非致命伤害。
Am J Public Health. 2005 Nov;95(11):1970-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.057505. Epub 2005 Sep 29.
10
Non-fatal injuries among adults with activity limitations and participation restrictions.活动受限和参与受限的成年人中的非致命伤害。
Inj Prev. 2005 Jun;11(3):157-62. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.006429.