van Geel C A, Visser A G, van Hooije C M, van den Aardweg G J, Kolkman-Deurloo I K, Kaatee R S, Levendag P C
Department of Clinical Radiobiology, Dr Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Hyperthermia. 1994 Nov-Dec;10(6):835-44. doi: 10.3109/02656739409012376.
Animal tumour experiments have been performed to elucidate the interactions between interstitial hyperthermia (IHT) and interstitial radiotherapy (IRT), and to obtain information about the most effective sequence of these treatment modalities. Experimental tumours, transplanted in the flank of Wag/Rij rats, were treated with IHT for 0.5 h at 44 degrees C, and with IRT using low dose-rate (LDR) iridium-192 sources. Both tumour cure probability and the fraction of clonogenic cells in vitro after different IHT and IRT treatments in vivo, were used as endpoints. The sequence of a short (0.5 h) IHT treatment followed by an extended LDR-IRT treatment lasting up to 10 days appeared to be very effective, and resulted in a significant thermal enhancement ratio of 1.34 at the 50% tumour cure probability level. A not significantly increased thermal enhancement of 1.06 was found when the same IHT treatment followed IRT. The level of clonogenic cell survival after IHT alone is high (0.24 +/- 0.08) compared with that after an IRT dose of 20 Gy (0.017 +/- 0.004). Clonogenic cell repopulation started 2-4 days after the in vivo treatment irrespective of the type of treatment. The in vivo combination of IHT and LDR-IRT resulted in lower surviving fractions compared with IRT alone, regardless of the time interval between the end of treatment and in vitro clonogenic assay. IHT followed by LDR-IRT appeared to be the most effective treatment in terms of tumour cure. The in vivo/in vitro studies indicated that the effect of hyperthermia is mainly attributed to radiosensitization, possibly by partial inhibition of sublethal damage repair processes during the subsequent irradiation. The hyperthermia-induced cytotoxicity was of minor importance as estimated from the surviving clonogenic fraction.
已进行动物肿瘤实验以阐明间质热疗(IHT)与间质放射治疗(IRT)之间的相互作用,并获取有关这些治疗方式最有效顺序的信息。将实验性肿瘤移植到Wag/Rij大鼠的胁腹,在44℃下用IHT治疗0.5小时,并使用低剂量率(LDR)铱-192源进行IRT治疗。肿瘤治愈概率以及体内不同IHT和IRT治疗后体外克隆形成细胞的比例均用作终点指标。短时间(0.5小时)IHT治疗后紧接着进行长达10天的延长LDR-IRT治疗的顺序似乎非常有效,在50%肿瘤治愈概率水平下产生了1.34的显著热增强比。当相同的IHT治疗在IRT之后进行时,发现热增强不显著增加,为1.06。与20 Gy的IRT剂量后相比,单独IHT后克隆形成细胞的存活水平较高(0.24±0.08)。无论治疗类型如何,体内治疗后2 - 4天开始克隆形成细胞再增殖。与单独的IRT相比,IHT和LDR-IRT的体内联合导致存活分数更低,无论治疗结束与体外克隆形成测定之间的时间间隔如何。就肿瘤治愈而言,IHT后紧接着LDR-IRT似乎是最有效的治疗方法。体内/体外研究表明,热疗的效果主要归因于放射增敏作用,可能是通过在后续照射期间部分抑制亚致死损伤修复过程。从存活的克隆形成分数估计,热疗诱导的细胞毒性不太重要。