Powles T J, Hickish T F, Makris A, Ashley S E, O'Brien M E, Tidy V A, Casey S, Nash A G, Sacks N, Cosgrove D
Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Mar;13(3):547-52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.3.547.
To evaluate in a randomized clinical trial systemic chemoendocrine therapy used as primary (neo-adjuvant) treatment before surgery in women with primary operable breast cancer.
Patients aged less than 70 years with clinically palpable, primary operable breast cancer diagnostically confirmed by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and suitable for treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and tamoxifen were considered eligible. Patients randomized to neoadjuvant treatment received four cycles of chemo-therapy for 3 months before surgery followed by another four cycles after surgery, and were compared with patients randomized to adjuvant therapy who received eight cycles of chemotherapy over 6 months after surgery.
Of 212 patients who were randomized to receive either adjuvant (n = 107) or neoadjuvant (n = 105) chemoendocrine therapy, 200 are now assessable for response. The two groups are comparable for age, menopausal status, disease stage, and surgical requirements. The overall clinical response rate was 85%, with a complete histologic response rate of 10%. There was a significant reduction in the requirement for mastectomy in patients who received neoadjuvant treatment (13%) as compared with those who received adjuvant therapy (28%) (P < .005). Symptomatic and hematologic acute toxicity was low and similar for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. The median follow-up period for patients in this trial is 28 months, during which time four patients have relapsed locally and 20, including one of the local relapses, have developed metastatic disease, 19 of whom have died. The follow-up period is too brief to evaluate relapse rate or survival duration.
This trial confirms previous reports of a high rate of response to neoadjuvant therapy, but is the first to include small primary cancers and to show, in the context of a randomized trial, a reduction in the requirement for mastectomy. Until disease-free and overall survival data are available from the larger National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)-18 trial, such neoadjuvant treatment cannot be recommended outside of a clinical trial.
在一项随机临床试验中评估全身化疗内分泌疗法作为原发性可手术乳腺癌女性患者手术前的主要(新辅助)治疗方法的效果。
年龄小于70岁、经细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)确诊为临床可触及的原发性可手术乳腺癌且适合手术、放疗、细胞毒性化疗和他莫昔芬治疗的患者被认为符合条件。随机接受新辅助治疗的患者在手术前接受3个月的4周期化疗,术后再接受4周期化疗,并与随机接受辅助治疗的患者进行比较,后者在术后6个月接受8周期化疗。
在212例随机接受辅助(n = 107)或新辅助(n = 105)化疗内分泌治疗的患者中,目前有200例可评估反应。两组在年龄、绝经状态、疾病分期和手术需求方面具有可比性。总体临床缓解率为85%,完全组织学缓解率为10%。与接受辅助治疗的患者(28%)相比,接受新辅助治疗的患者乳房切除术需求显著降低(13%)(P <.005)。辅助治疗和新辅助治疗的症状性和血液学急性毒性较低且相似。该试验患者的中位随访期为28个月,在此期间,4例患者出现局部复发,20例患者发生转移性疾病,包括1例局部复发患者,其中19例死亡。随访期过短,无法评估复发率或生存期。
该试验证实了先前关于新辅助治疗高缓解率的报道,但首次纳入了小的原发性癌症,并在随机试验的背景下显示乳房切除术需求降低。在更大规模的国家外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目(NSABP)-18试验获得无病生存和总生存数据之前,除临床试验外,不建议进行这种新辅助治疗。