Ghoneim M M, Chen P, el-Zahaby H M, Block R I
Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1994 Dec;49(4):1061-6. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(94)90265-8.
Two experiments were conducted in rabbits to examine the effects of ketamine (0, 100, and 200 mg/kg) on the acquisition and retention of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response (NMR). Classical conditioning of the NMR was accomplished by pairing tone and light conditioned stimuli (CS) with paraorbital shock as the unconditioned stimulus (UCS). Experiment 1 assessed the effects of the drug on acquisition and retention of conditioned responses (CR) and determined the role of previous exposure to the experimental environment. Ketamine blocked the display of CR. However, data from subsequent retention testing under nondrug conditions revealed that rabbits that had previously received 100 mg/kg ketamine learned faster than saline-treated rabbits during the acquisition phases. Rabbits that received 100 mg/kg ketamine and were placed in the experimental chambers, but not presented with stimuli during the acquisition phase, did not learn faster during the retention phase than naive rabbits. Experiment 2 controlled further for the effects of nonassociative, unlearned processes. Control groups were presented with unpaired CS and UCS training after drug administration, and subsequently received conventional acquisition sessions under nondrug conditions. Their data indicated that the ketamine group's rapid acquisition during retention testing could not be attributed to nonassociative factors. We conclude that, although it was impossible directly to observe acquisition in rabbits under the influence of ketamine, it was possible that learning occurred as manifested by "savings" in subsequent learning trials.
在兔子身上进行了两项实验,以研究氯胺酮(0、100和200毫克/千克)对经典条件反射性瞬膜反应(NMR)的获得和保持的影响。NMR的经典条件反射是通过将音调与光条件刺激(CS)与眶周电击作为非条件刺激(UCS)配对来完成的。实验1评估了药物对条件反应(CR)的获得和保持的影响,并确定了先前暴露于实验环境的作用。氯胺酮阻断了CR的表现。然而,在非药物条件下随后的保持测试数据显示,先前接受100毫克/千克氯胺酮的兔子在获得阶段比生理盐水处理的兔子学习得更快。接受100毫克/千克氯胺酮并置于实验箱中,但在获得阶段未接受刺激的兔子,在保持阶段的学习速度并不比未接触过的兔子快。实验2进一步控制了非联想性、未学习过程的影响。对照组在给药后接受不配对的CS和UCS训练,随后在非药物条件下接受常规的获得训练。他们的数据表明,氯胺酮组在保持测试期间的快速获得不能归因于非联想因素。我们得出结论,虽然在氯胺酮影响下无法直接观察兔子的获得过程,但在随后的学习试验中通过“节省”表现出来的学习可能已经发生。