Suppr超能文献

双盲究竟有多“双盲”?这重要吗?

How double blind is double blind? And does it matter?

作者信息

Huskisson E C, Scott J

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1976 Apr;3(2):331-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1976.tb00612.x.

Abstract

In an apparently double blind crossover study, two experienced measurement technicians were able to identify many of the treatment periods. They most often correctly identified aspirin, a drug with prominent effects and side effects. It is argued that in many circumstances it is better to use a blind observer who is not concerned with the giving of treatment or the collection of side effects.

摘要

在一项明显的双盲交叉研究中,两名经验丰富的测量技术人员能够识别出许多治疗阶段。他们最常正确识别出阿司匹林,一种具有显著疗效和副作用的药物。有人认为,在许多情况下,最好使用不参与治疗给药或副作用收集的盲法观察者。

相似文献

1
How double blind is double blind? And does it matter?双盲究竟有多“双盲”?这重要吗?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1976 Apr;3(2):331-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1976.tb00612.x.
2
Drug trial in rheumatoid arthritis: a new design.类风湿性关节炎药物试验:一种新设计。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1978 Feb;23(2):233-40. doi: 10.1002/cpt1978232233.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验