强化糖尿病治疗对神经病变发生和进展的影响。糖尿病控制与并发症试验研究组。

The effect of intensive diabetes therapy on the development and progression of neuropathy. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1995 Apr 15;122(8):561-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-8-199504150-00001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether intensive therapy designed to achieve glycemic levels as close to normal as possible prevents or slows the progression of neuropathy when compared with conventional therapy in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.

DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

29 U.S. and Canadian clinical centers.

PARTICIPANTS

1441 patients aged 13 to 39 years, of whom 726 had had insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus for 1 to 5 years and had no retinopathy at baseline (primary prevention cohort); 715 had had diabetes for 1 to 15 years and had minimal to moderate nonproliferative retinopathy at baseline (secondary intervention cohort).

INTERVENTION

Intensive therapy with three or more daily insulin injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion guided by four or more glucose tests per day compared with conventional therapy with one or two daily insulin injections.

RESULTS

Intensive therapy reduced the development of confirmed clinical neuropathy (defined as a history or physical examination consistent with clinical neuropathy confirmed by either abnormal nerve conduction or autonomic nervous system testing) by 64% (95% CI, 45% to 76%) in the combined cohorts after 5 years of follow-up (5% of the intensive therapy group compared with 13% of the conventional therapy group). The prevalence of abnormal nerve conduction and abnormal autonomic nervous system function were reduced by 44% (CI, 34% to 53%) and 53% (CI, 24% to 70%), respectively (26% of the intensive treatment group developed abnormal nerve conduction compared with 46% of the conventional treatment group; 4% of the intensive treatment group had abnormal autonomic nervous system function compared with 9% of the conventional treatment group). Finally, nerve conduction velocities generally remained stable with intensive therapy but decreased significantly with conventional therapy.

CONCLUSION

Intensive diabetes therapy markedly delays or prevents the development of clinically manifest diabetic polyneuropathy as confirmed by objective nerve function testing in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

摘要

目的

在糖尿病控制与并发症试验中,比较强化治疗(旨在使血糖水平尽可能接近正常)与传统治疗相比,是否能预防或延缓胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者神经病变的进展。

设计

多中心、随机、对照临床试验。

地点

美国和加拿大的29个临床中心。

参与者

1441名年龄在13至39岁的患者,其中726名患有胰岛素依赖型糖尿病1至5年,基线时无视网膜病变(一级预防队列);715名患有糖尿病1至15年,基线时有轻度至中度非增殖性视网膜病变(二级干预队列)。

干预措施

每日三次或更多次胰岛素注射或持续皮下胰岛素输注的强化治疗,每天进行四次或更多次血糖检测,与每日一到两次胰岛素注射的传统治疗相比。

结果

在联合队列中随访5年后,强化治疗使确诊的临床神经病变(定义为病史或体格检查与经异常神经传导或自主神经系统检测确诊的临床神经病变一致)的发生率降低了64%(95%CI,45%至76%)(强化治疗组为5%,传统治疗组为13%)。神经传导异常和自主神经系统功能异常的患病率分别降低了44%(CI,34%至53%)和53%(CI,24%至70%)(强化治疗组26%出现神经传导异常,传统治疗组为46%;强化治疗组4%有自主神经系统功能异常,传统治疗组为9%)。最后,强化治疗时神经传导速度通常保持稳定,而传统治疗时则显著下降。

结论

在胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者中,通过客观神经功能检测证实,强化糖尿病治疗可显著延迟或预防临床明显的糖尿病多发性神经病变的发生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索