Diabetologia. 1998 Apr;41(4):416-23. doi: 10.1007/s001250050924.
In the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), 1441 insulin-dependent diabetic patients in the primary prevention and secondary intervention cohorts were randomly assigned to either conventional or intensive therapy and followed for up to 9 years. Baseline and biennial measurements of autonomic function (R-R variation, Valsalva ratio, and postural testing) as well as quarterly assessment of autonomic symptoms were performed throughout the trial. There were no differences at baseline between patients randomized to intensive vs conventional therapy. In general, autonomic abnormalities increased during the trial; however, R-R variation was less abnormal in the intensively treated secondary intervention (7% with abnormal results at 4-6 years) compared with the conventionally treated group (14% with abnormal results, p = 0.004) and in the combined cohorts (5% of intensive treatment subjects with abnormal results vs 9% of conventional treatment subjects, p = 0.0017). There were few abnormal Valsalva ratios or postural tests at baseline or during the trial. No significant difference in Valsalva ratio or postural tests occurred between the intensive and conventional treatment groups. Both the R-R variation and the Valsalva ratio had significantly greater slopes of decline over time in the patients randomized to conventional therapy (1.48 points per year and 0.015 per year, respectively) compared to those randomized to intensive therapy (0.912 points per year and 0.0025 per year). Of the symptoms related to autonomic function, only incomplete bladder emptying was significantly more common in the conventional group. In summary, the DCCT documented that intensive therapy can slow the progression and the development of abnormal autonomic tests.
在糖尿病控制与并发症试验(DCCT)中,1441名处于一级预防和二级干预队列的胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者被随机分配至常规治疗组或强化治疗组,并随访长达9年。在整个试验过程中,进行了自主神经功能的基线和两年一次的测量(R-R间期变异、乏氏比率和体位试验)以及自主神经症状的季度评估。随机分配至强化治疗组与常规治疗组的患者在基线时没有差异。总体而言,在试验期间自主神经异常情况有所增加;然而,与常规治疗组(4至6年时有14%结果异常)相比,强化治疗的二级干预组中R-R间期变异的异常情况较少(4至6年时有7%结果异常,p = 0.004),在合并队列中也是如此(强化治疗组有5%受试者结果异常,常规治疗组有9%受试者结果异常,p = 0.0017)。在基线或试验期间,乏氏比率或体位试验异常情况很少。强化治疗组与常规治疗组之间在乏氏比率或体位试验方面没有显著差异。与随机分配至强化治疗组的患者相比(每年分别下降0.912个点和0.0025),随机分配至常规治疗组的患者中,R-R间期变异和乏氏比率随时间下降的斜率显著更大(每年分别下降1.48个点和0.015)。在与自主神经功能相关的症状中,只有膀胱排空不全在常规治疗组中明显更常见。总之,DCCT证明强化治疗可以减缓自主神经测试异常的进展和发展。