Carter J R, Lau M, Fowler J M, Carlson J W, Carson L F, Twiggs L B
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Mar;172(3):901-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90019-5.
Our purpose was to investigate the blood flow characteristics of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Questions posed by our research were as follows: (1) Can malignant ovarian tumors be predicted by color flow Doppler imaging? (2) What are the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of such prediction? (3) Which color flow Doppler parameter is superior in its accuracy of prediction?
One hundred twenty-three consecutive patients seen for suspected pelvic masses were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography and color flow Doppler imaging. A morphologic assessment was initially performed, followed by color flow Doppler analysis. A comparison of findings between the benign and malignant tumors was made by analyzing different thresholds of the intratumoral pulsatility and resistance index values by means of receiver-operator characteristic curves. By calculation of the area index under each receiver-operator characteristic curve the efficiency of the pulsatility and resistance index values in predicting malignancy was determined.
Fifty-six benign and 23 malignant tumors were pathologically confirmed. Patients with malignant tumors were more likely to be postmenopausal and were older than patients with benign tumors. Malignant tumors were more likely to be larger and to have either a complex or solid pattern. Absent color flow was more common in benign tumors, and increased color flow was found equally among benign and malignant tumors. There was no difference in systolic, diastolic, or mean velocities between benign and malignant tumors. The calculated pulsatility and resistance index values were lower in patients with malignant tumors compared with those with benign tumors. No significant difference exists in performance of either the pulsatility or resistance index in predicting malignancy. The best thresholds for predicting malignancy were obtained with a pulsatility index of 1.0 and resistance index of 0.6.
Transvaginal ultrasonography is accurate in distinguishing benign from malignant ovarian tumors. Color flow Doppler findings are not specific enough to be used independent of gray-scale ultrasonography.
我们的目的是研究良性和恶性卵巢肿瘤的血流特征。我们的研究提出了以下问题:(1)彩色多普勒血流成像能否预测恶性卵巢肿瘤?(2)这种预测的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值是多少?(3)哪种彩色多普勒参数在预测准确性方面更具优势?
对连续123例因盆腔肿物疑似而就诊的患者进行经阴道超声检查和彩色多普勒血流成像评估。首先进行形态学评估,随后进行彩色多普勒分析。通过利用受试者工作特征曲线分析肿瘤内搏动性和阻力指数值的不同阈值,对良性和恶性肿瘤的检查结果进行比较。通过计算每个受试者工作特征曲线下的面积指数,确定搏动性和阻力指数值在预测恶性肿瘤方面的有效性。
56例良性肿瘤和23例恶性肿瘤经病理证实。恶性肿瘤患者更可能处于绝经后状态,且比良性肿瘤患者年龄更大。恶性肿瘤更可能体积更大,且具有复杂或实性模式。无血流信号在良性肿瘤中更常见,而血流增加在良性和恶性肿瘤中出现的比例相同。良性和恶性肿瘤之间的收缩期、舒张期或平均速度没有差异。与良性肿瘤患者相比,恶性肿瘤患者计算得出的搏动性和阻力指数值更低。搏动性指数或阻力指数在预测恶性肿瘤方面的表现没有显著差异。预测恶性肿瘤的最佳阈值为搏动性指数1.0和阻力指数0.6。
经阴道超声检查在区分良性和恶性卵巢肿瘤方面是准确的。彩色多普勒血流成像结果不够特异,不能独立于灰阶超声检查使用。