Lewis L M, Miller D K, Morley J E, Nork M J, Lasater L C
Emergency Medicine Division, St. Louis University Health Sciences Center, MO.
Am J Emerg Med. 1995 Mar;13(2):142-5. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90080-2.
To determine the sensitivity of an emergency physician's conventional evaluation compared with the validated Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) regarding the recognition of acute confusional states (delirium) in elderly Emergency Department (ED) patients, a cohort of 385 patients presenting to an urban teaching hospital ED was systematically assembled. Patients had to be conscious, able to speak and older than 64 years of age. After the ED physician had examined the patient and test results had been obtained, a series of geriatric assessment results, including one for the likely presence of delirium, was made available to the ED physician; however, no result was specifically highlighted. All patients were assessed by an attending ED physician in the customary fashion. In addition, a study nurse interviewed patients using the CAM and followed patient outcomes for three months. The ED record for all patients with delirium or "probable" delirium, as determined by the CAM, were reviewed for physician diagnosis and disposition to determine how often delirium had been recognized by the emergency physician. Thirty-eight of the 385 patients screened (10%) met criteria for delirium or "probable" delirium; ED charts were complete for 35 of these, which constituted the study sample. The ED diagnosis included delirium or an acceptable synonym in 6 (17%) of these patients. In the 21 patients (62%) admitted to the hospital, the most common ED diagnosis was infection "rule out sepsis" (n = 7). Six of 13 patients discharged (46%) were diagnosed as "status post fall" without evidence of significant injury.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为了确定与经过验证的谵妄评估方法(CAM)相比,急诊医生的常规评估在识别老年急诊科(ED)患者急性意识模糊状态(谵妄)方面的敏感性,我们系统地收集了一组到城市教学医院急诊科就诊的385例患者。患者必须意识清醒、能够说话且年龄超过64岁。在急诊医生检查患者并获得检查结果后,一系列老年评估结果,包括一项关于谵妄可能存在情况的结果,会提供给急诊医生;然而,没有任何结果会被特别突出显示。所有患者均由急诊主治医生以常规方式进行评估。此外,一名研究护士使用CAM对患者进行访谈,并跟踪患者三个月的预后情况。对所有经CAM确定为谵妄或“可能”谵妄的患者的急诊记录进行审查,以了解急诊医生对谵妄的识别频率以及诊断和处置情况。385例筛查患者中有38例(10%)符合谵妄或“可能”谵妄标准;其中35例患者急诊病历完整,构成研究样本。这些患者中有6例(17%)的急诊诊断包括谵妄或可接受的同义词。在21例住院患者(62%)中,最常见的急诊诊断是感染“排除败血症”(n = 7)。13例出院患者中有6例(46%)被诊断为“跌倒后状态”,但无明显损伤证据。(摘要截短至250字)