• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科肿瘤护理中的家庭研究。

Family research in pediatric oncology nursing.

作者信息

Birenbaum L K

机构信息

Mary Margaret Walther Program for Cancer Care Research, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis 46202.

出版信息

J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1995 Jan;12(1):25-38. doi: 10.1177/104345429501200107.

DOI:10.1177/104345429501200107
PMID:7893458
Abstract

This article reviews and critiques pediatric oncology family nursing research and suggests advancing the research basis of pediatric oncology family nursing practice. The article is organized around the conceptual issues that challenge family nurse researchers, the methods used in reviewing the literature, instrumentation that reflects conceptual issues, findings, and suggestions. Methodological issues abound in this literature and some shared findings across studies do exist: parenting is a concern of all family members; family communication problems have been identified from several perspectives; and increased stress at some points in treatment is reported by all members of the family. Coping is an area of limited agreement and adjustment is poorly articulated in this literature. Longitudinal studies, improved instrumentation, use of triangulation, and publication of more complicated data sets that include family measurement are recommended to advance the scientific basis of pediatric oncology family nursing.

摘要

本文回顾并评论了儿科肿瘤学家庭护理研究,并建议推进儿科肿瘤学家庭护理实践的研究基础。本文围绕挑战家庭护士研究者的概念性问题、文献综述所使用的方法、反映概念性问题的工具、研究结果及建议展开。该文献中存在大量方法学问题,同时也确实存在一些跨研究的共同发现:养育是所有家庭成员共同关心的问题;已从多个角度识别出家庭沟通问题;据报道,治疗过程中某些阶段所有家庭成员的压力都有所增加。应对是一个共识有限的领域,而在该文献中对适应的阐述也很薄弱。建议开展纵向研究、改进测量工具、采用三角测量法,并发表包含家庭测量的更复杂数据集,以推进儿科肿瘤学家庭护理的科学基础。

相似文献

1
Family research in pediatric oncology nursing.儿科肿瘤护理中的家庭研究。
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1995 Jan;12(1):25-38. doi: 10.1177/104345429501200107.
2
The silent ones: a review of sampling issues and biases pertinent to the area of pediatric oncology procedural pain.沉默的群体:儿科肿瘤治疗性疼痛领域相关抽样问题及偏差综述
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1996 Jan;13(1):31-9. doi: 10.1177/104345429601300107.
3
Oncology nursing research priorities: a Canadian perspective.肿瘤护理研究重点:加拿大视角
Cancer Nurs. 1998 Dec;21(6):394-401. doi: 10.1097/00002820-199812000-00003.
4
The Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms in Pediatric Oncology Nursing: A Conceptual and Empirical Fit?儿科肿瘤护理中不愉快症状理论:概念与实证匹配吗?
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2019 Nov/Dec;36(6):436-447. doi: 10.1177/1043454219844225. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
5
The 1992 APON Delphi study to establish research priorities for pediatric oncology nursing. Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses.1992年儿科肿瘤护理研究优先事项确定的儿科肿瘤护理协会德尔菲研究。
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1994 Jan;11(1):20-7; discussion 28-30. doi: 10.1177/104345429401100106.
6
A theory for pediatric oncology nursing practice and research.儿科肿瘤护理实践与研究的一种理论。
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1990 Oct;7(4):131-8. doi: 10.1177/104345429000700402.
7
An Analytic Review of Clinical Implications From Nursing and Psychosocial Research Within Swedish Pediatric Oncology.瑞典儿科肿瘤学中护理与社会心理研究的临床意义分析综述
J Pediatr Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;30(4):550-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
8
Identifying nursing research priorities in a pediatric clinical trials cooperative group: the Pediatric Oncology Group experience.确定儿科临床试验协作组中的护理研究重点:儿科肿瘤学组的经验。
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2000 Apr;17(2):83-7. doi: 10.1177/104345420001700209.
9
[Clinical Nurse Specialist: a model of advanced nursing practice in pediatric oncology in Brazil].[临床护理专家:巴西儿科肿瘤学高级护理实践模式]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013 Dec;47(6):1426-30. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420130000600025.
10
Dusting off that old proposal: how to survive in the land of research.重新审视那份旧提案:如何在研究领域中生存。
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1998 Oct;15(4):229-33. doi: 10.1177/104345429801500406.